Buck, you're a disgrace. You inveigh against "spam" but you don't even know what it is.
And it's hard to believe the dishonesty of referring to Alex as "A ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote : Ranchydog could certainly attempt to give some spiritual or FFL context as to dumping these posts here. She knows the rules. This is pure spam and a lazy writer's cheap shot diluting the drink of the salon of spiritual and FFL conversation of FFL here otherwise. Enforce the unifying code of FFL guidelines Rick has given us about spamming FFL or you will let this place down entirely into the gutter for lack of any over-seeing moderating discipline. Beware the spammer and spammer beware on FFL, -Buck No, you selectively copied that out of context. The guideline is: Fairfield Life focuses on topics of interest to seekers (and finders) of truth and liberation everywhere. -Buck A FFL Moderator writes: To refresh your memory: "Pretty much any topic is fair game. Currently, there's a lot of discussion about American politics. We have discussed spirituality, politics, economics, morality and higher states of consciousness, drug laws, evolution vs. creationism, enlightenment, advaita, reincarnation, karma, Jyotish (Vedic astrology), yagya, Ayurveda, dzogchen, tantra, channeling, vegetarianism, kundalini, celibacy, sexuality, homosexuality, abortion, racism, UFOs, Buddhism, Hinduism, Veda, Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Scientology, etc." What part of "Pretty much any topic is fair game." do you not understand? It is called spam, without any attempt at context. Lacking attempt at context has long been a standard Rick has used against spammers. Om, is Hillary a meditator? Yes Hillary is terribly interesting and being talked about elsewhere. Just wondering what this has to do with FFL? Or is it spam? Did you have a connection to make with FFL, the Fairfield meditating community? How's about a question, would meditators vote for Hillary? How would you read the meditator community on Hillary? The spiritual vote here, would it go for Hillary? -Buck Raunchydog writes: "With 2016 speculation ramping up, the public commentary about Hillary Clinton is following predictable patterns. Several pervasive anti-Hillary themes have been dusted off for yet another political cycle; these are carefully-crafted and patently false talking points designed to dehumanize and demean her. Many of the themes are rooted in the sexism and misogyny that permeate our culture." Latest talking point: "NEW Anti-Hillary Theme #11: HER HEALTH Disgusting, unfounded speculation. http://peterdaou.com/2014/01/guide-to-anti-hillary-themes/#more-2616 http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpeterdaou.com%2F2014%2F01%2Fguide-to-anti-hillary-themes%2F%23more-2616&h=-AQEZacpv&s=1 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fleetwood_macncheese@...> wrote : I don't think there are extraordinary health issues with Hillary, but Rove is an excellent strategist. He is a class of political operative, who will say anything to win. So, he chooses a topic that is alarming, personal health, and then wields his innuendo, like a master, "I never said she had brain damage...". Brilliant - unprincipled, scummy, and underhanded, but brilliant, nonetheless. The nickname GW Bush had for him, was, "Turd Blossom". Kinda says it all. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_esq@...> wrote : Karl Rove is questioning Hillary Clinton's health for running as president in the next election. In her jyotish chart, it shows that she will be running a weak Sun in her first house. So, that means that this health issue will be a major factor in her decision to run for the presidency. It is likely that she will address this point on February 17, 2015 by announcing that she will not run for the office. http://news.yahoo.com/rove-hillary-clinton-brain-damage-135738855.html http://news.yahoo.com/rove-hillary-clinton-brain-damage-135738855.html
