Have you really never read or heard any of the arguments against abortion? That's hard to believe.
BTW, abortion is not necessarily always a "personal tragedy" to those who have one. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote : Lawson, I admit I'm flummoxed by peoples' fanatical position on Roe vs. Wade. What is that about?! Abortion is a personal tragedy for sure. But why does the religious right try to turn it into a matter of public policy?! On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:06 AM, "LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: Saunders isn't a corporatist, and I certainly would vote for him in a national election. But I would never, ever vote for him in a primary. Lesser of two evils issues are all we CAN get in Presidential races and all we will ever get unless we take a page from the political book of the Religious Right, who have been working to overturn Roe v Wade since the day it started by starting from the very bottom and voting in sympathetic dog catchers and school board members who then run for higher political officer after they establish their political credentials. Moderates and liberals simply don't have the multi-generational fanaticism to play that game, counting on people's "better nature," instead. The Religious Right knows that there's no such thing [the Bible told them so], so they always assume the worst about everyone and manipulate, er, act accordingly. L ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <raunchydog@...> wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
