--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Yes, I think you are on to something here. My attunement these > days > > > is definitely, and perhaps always has been in the visible light > to > > > ultraviolet spectrum. Love that ultraviolet!!! > > > > Here's some more on the question you brought up when wondering > what > > was between Shiva and Vishnu as one was traversing the outside of > the > > Hiranyagarbha, and we were reminded of the thin golden disk or > > equatorial band which was the projection of and from the central > > Brahma-sun-- this thin band is indictive of the "gap" one > encounters > > when flipping from one side of a transcendent state to the > another. > > Thus within the state of Transcendence, between the subtlest > > Being/Love of Transcendence-I (Vishnu-Shiva-Shiva) and the densest > > Consciousness/Light of its other "side," Transcendence-II (Brahma- > > Vishnu-Vishnu) -- is the gap apparently overseen by Leo and the 7 > > Rishis of the Great Bear (Ursa Major), at "Swargaloka" between the > Sex > > Center and the Navel Center. This gap is that-which-is-NOT any of > the > > properties of the two sides: hence it could be called a "shadow" > Shiva- > > Brahma-Brahma -- or a state of "death." > > > > Similarly the gap between Transcendence-II-prime at the subtlest > > Consciousness/Light (Brahma-Shiva-Shiva) and its other "side" of > > densest Bliss, Transcendence-I-prime (Shiva-Vishnu-Vishnu) -- that > gap > > apparently overseen by the Galactic Center, at "Janaloka" between > the > > Heart and the Throat -- is that-which-is-NOT any of the properties > of > > the to sides: a "shadow" Vishnu-Brahma-Brahma, or a state > of "birth." > > > > Finally, the remaining gap -- between Blissful Dissolution, Shiva- > > Shiva-Shiva and Loving Conception, Vishnu-Vishnu-Vishnu -- is that- > > which-is-NOT any of these properties: the "shadow" Brahma-Brahma- > > Brahma, or state of golden no-time-space, that thin gold band of > > perfect equilibrium between the utter dissolution of Shiva and the > > beginnings of Vishnu's coalescence. In the lunar phases > this "shadow" > > Brahma-Brahma corresponds to the moment when the moon is actually > > conjunct the sun. In the Nakshatra-system we were discussing, this > > moment is apparently overseen by the Pleaides, at "Sat-Loka," > between > > the crown and the feet. Apprently this would also be the true Sat- > > Yuga :-) > > > Very interesting, as I was seeing or imagining the original view of > Vishnu/Brahma/Shiva as a sphere. This then is a description of the > other side of that sphere, as you say of flipping from one > trascendent state to another. It balances the energy, and creates > the wholeness. It might be interesting to see what the correlations > of the 27 states of consciousness are, as viewed from this other > side, rather like the negative of a photograph. Very blissful! Thank > you.
Yes, OK; I would see Vishnu-Brahma-Shiva as a torus, with Vishnu (Love, Matter, Sattva) being the movement away from the equator and shrinking as it approaches the (say, south) pole, and then inverting into a cone or mountain or pyramid sucking or coalescing from the surface down (or up) inside toward the center point, Brahma (Light, Consciousness, Rajas). The other side, moving from the center away and out the opposite side's cone or mountain or pyramid, diffusing and dispersing back out to the (say, north pole's) surface and back on itself towards the equator, would be Shiva (Energy, Bliss, Tamas). The equator itself would be the "shadow" Brahma, the momentary equilibrium before shrinking back towards the pole and in as Vishnu again. As far as I can see, these "gaps" only exist in a major way at the three places earlier described, because only there are the gunas concentrated and "polarized" enough to cast a large intermediary shadow of "not-this." Between the other sub-sub-gunas, the momentary shadow cast actually manifests a moment later anyhow: hence (for example) between Brahma-Vishnu-Visnu and Brahma-Vishnu-Brahma, there is no real shadow between Brahma-Vishnu- and Brahma-Vishnu, as they are the same. The mainguna "shadow" for Brahma- would be *both* Shiva and Vishnu, and the subguna "shadow" for -Vishnu- would be *both* Brahma and Shiva: too blurry in other words to really define a shadow. The only real shadow would be the tertiary one of (Brahma- Vishnu)-Shiva, which appears a moment later anyhow. However, between Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva (G.C.) and Brahma-Brahma-Vishnu (U.C.), one *could* posit a secondary shadow of (Brahma)-Shiva-Brahma ("Shiva- consciousness," complement of C.C.; "THAT AM I") -- but again, as the mainguna (Brahma) is the same, you're not going to get as distinct a shadow-effect as you do between Vishnu-Shiva-Shiva and Brahma-Vishnu-Vishnu, or between Brahma-Shiva-Shiva and Shiva-Vishnu- Vishnu, or between Shiva-Shiva-Shiva and Vishnu-Vishnu-Vishnu... :-) ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/