The perennial question: Does Barry actually believe the garbage and flat-out 
lies he's spouted here, or does he simply think readers are so stupid they'll 
believe it's all true? 

 In any case, he's attacking me because he's still smarting from his fiasco two 
days ago about the "empty message" I had sent accidentally--first perceiving it 
as "purple-faced apoplexy," and then claiming this message with nothing in it 
was a result of my having "jumped the gun" and sent it when I was halfway 
through writing it. What a hoot.
 

 Needless, as usual, to point out, nothing he says about me or Robin below is 
true. (Just as a for-instance, does anyone remember my having "played tapes" of 
Robin on FFL? Apparently Barry had a nightmare of my doing so and thinks it was 
reality.)
 

 Another telling line: He declares he's always been "uninterested" in Robin. 
Anybody who's been reading his posts knows he's been obsessed with Robin ever 
since Robin turned up here, and still is, after Robin's long gone--this very 
post is proof.
 

 He also reiterates his idiotic "say/do" dichotomy, seemingly not aware that 
all we know about on FFL is what other posters say, not what they do. That's 
one of his weirder notions.
 

 As to what Barry calls Robin's "minor experiences," they were enough for 
Maharishi to ask Robin to describe them to the participants on his six-month 
course, with cameras running. It's unclear whether Maharishi actually endorsed 
Robin as being in Unity consciousness, but Maharishi clearly thought his 
experiences were significant.
 

 It's amusing that in another of his posts today, Barry insists (correctly) 
that because experiences are subjective, we can't tell from someone's account 
of their experiences whether they're enlightened or not--yet Barry here 
declares that he can tell Robin wasn't.
 

 Another classic Barry:
 

 I perceived Robin's writings here -- both past and present -- as complete 
ego-rants steeped in narcissism and devoid of any value, spiritual or 
otherwise. I didn't bother to read most of them then, and I'm certainly not 
about to bother with them now.

 

 He didn't bother to read most of Robin's posts, yet he perceived none of them 
to have any value. Only Barry could write that without realizing it makes him 
look like an utter doofus. (Be interesting to know, too, where Barry has seen 
"present" posts of Robin. He hasn't posted anything since April of last year. 
"Both past and present" is a rhetorical flourish, one of many Barry puts in his 
posts because they sound good, even though they make no sense.)
 

 Hey, Barry, relax, for pete's sake. I didn't suggest you read any of Robin's 
old posts.
 

 Finally:
 

 Now I've commented, so Judy can claim to have "pushed my buttons."
 

 I'm not sure how Barry perceives that my post to Lawson, which didn't mention 
or allude to Barry in any way, was intended to "push his buttons." I guess it's 
easier to do than he claims. ;-)
 

 I won't go into all the other lies and misstatements in this post. If the 
"lurking reporters" are interested, they (or any other lurker) is welcome to 
contact me privately. Likewise, if any of the active participants here thinks 
any of what he said might be valid, I'll be happy to explain why it's not, in 
public.
 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote :

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 12:34 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi explains how UC becomes Brahman

 
 
   Robin explained to you why that first remark of Maharishi's is misleading.
 That was the post I linked to earlier; I gather you didn't bother to reread 
it. 

 It's really one of his better posts.
 


 











Just for fun, does anyone remember how I've characterized Judy as a "Robin 
cultist" in the past, lurking in the background just waiting for his name to 
come up again so that she can preach his virtues to people she's trying to 
"convert?" Well, she's finally progressed to "playing tapes" by him, posting 
links to his "greatest hits," and then, when people don't respond the way she 
wants them to, berating them for "not bothering to reread" them.  

Might I point out that she's doing the same thing with Robin that she does with 
that *other* spiritual teacher she never met (Maharishi), and posting a set of 
quotes, then declaring that she "knows" what they mean and how important they 
are, whereas other people don't. Same cultist, different cult. 

I am as uninterested in Robin Carlsen now as I was when he was here in person, 
as opposed to being present in absentia, having his virtues preached by one of 
his groupies. One of the reasons for this is that -- unlike Judy -- I place 
very little value on what a person SAYS. I assess them based on what they DO. 
In this assessment, as I remember it, I was joined by a number of people who 
were briefly part of Robin's cult back in the day, and who participated on FFL 
for a short while. Again, as I remember it, *with only one exception* (Ann) not 
one of them believed that Robin had "changed" in any significant way since the 
days they were involved with him. They looked at what he wrote on FFL, and how 
he treated people on FFL, and saw the same narcissism and the same abusive 
control freak they'd seen "back in the day." And they said so. 

I tended to agree with them. I wrote Robin off as uninteresting after his first 
few "wall of words" posts. Then again, I have had the benefit of many 
discussions with a person who was a veritable expert on Narcissistic 
Personality Disorder back in Santa Fe, and thus recognized the NPD profile 
immediately. I had nothing to compare with from the past, but his *present* 
behaviors on FFL pretty much *screamed* classic NPD, and these present-day 
behaviors did not seem to differ significantly from any of the stories posted 
of his behaviors in the past. 

So I stand now on the assessment I made back then. In my OPINION, I agree with 
Lawson -- Robin was never enlightened. The subjective experiences that he 
talked about were in my opinion the result of a bad "drug cocktail," consisting 
of the combination of lifelong, well-established Narcissistic Personality 
Disorder enhanced by the psychotropic effects of "long rounding." He had a few 
minor experiences, and being the narcissist he was, *projected onto them* the 
highest state he'd been told about by Maharishi -- Unity. From the little I 
read of his narcisso-rants, *few to none of them* ever coincided with 
Maharishi's descriptions of what perception would actually be like from the 
state of Unity. They were pretty much all from the point of view of Robin's 
Ego, and the world he saw around him was all merely a reflection of Robin's 
Ego. That's NPD, not Unity. 

All of this said, I certainly don't mind if people here continue to discuss him 
as if he were worth their time. It's their time -- and life -- to waste, if 
they get off on that sorta thing. But assuming that Lawson *didn't* bother to 
go back and read the "homework" Judy assigned to him in her attempts to convert 
him, I will be joining him in this approach in the future. I perceived Robin's 
writings here -- both past and present -- as complete ego-rants steeped in 
narcissism and devoid of any value, spiritual or otherwise. I didn't bother to 
read most of them then, and I'm certainly not about to bother with them now. 
Life is too short to spend reading the "manifestos" of crazy people. 

There. Now I've commented, so Judy can claim to have "pushed my buttons." I 
know this won't make her as happy as, say, someone here saying, "Wow. You're 
RIGHT, Judy. I was all wrong about Robin, but now I realize that he was just as 
interesting as you believe he was. Sign me up for the next Robin Cult group 
satsang and orgy!" But at least she can claim some kinda "win."  :-)

Narcissists fall for other narcissists. People who believe that what they SAY 
is more important than what they DO always fall for others who believe the same 
thing. I've said it before and I'll possibly say it again -- Judy fell for 
Robin because he's the only person she's ever encountered on this forum crazier 
and more "established in narcissism" than she is. 

Now you all can go back to discussing him and reading his "greatest hits," as 
reposted by his cult follower. I've got more important things to do, like 
washing my socks...  :-)














 
 

 
  


  • [FairfieldLife]... Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
    • [Fairfield... lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
      • [Fairf... fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
        • [F... lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
          • ... fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
          • ... authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
            • ... TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
              • ... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
              • ... authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
                • ... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
                • ... awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
    • [Fairfield... fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • [Fairf... lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
        • [F... merudanda
        • [F... merudanda
          • ... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
            • ... Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
              • ... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
                • ... Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Reply via email to