Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: LightMint Gone Bad

['Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]]

*From:* "'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

On 6/16/2014 8:52 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com 
<mailto:turquoi...@yahoo.com> [FairfieldLife] wrote:
*From:* "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<mailto:authfri...@yahoo.com[FairfieldLife]> 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> <mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

LURKING REPORTERS: More ironclad evidence of why you should not trust 
what Barry tells you. Check it out with someone reliable.

So, I wonder if the lurking reporters realize that the informant Barry 
is also a purported science writer?

On 6/16/2014 9:36 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

That's actually how I met a couple of them. Others I've corresponded 
with because of their coverage of other cults, such as Scientology, 
the Andrew Cohen group, and pseudo-Christian groups. The latter are 
quite familiar with cult apologetics, and at determining what is fact, 
what is fantasy, and what are outright lies.

They are also quite clear about my role here, which is that of 
provocateur, inciting people I consider cultists to lose their shit 
and thus reveal more of their cult thinking. Like some non-lurkers 
here, they may not agree with my tactics, but they often appreciate 
the results.  :-)
>
Keep up the good work!

Let's make it as complicated as possible for the lurking, reporting, 
science writers. So far, it seems to be working since they don't seem to 
be able to determine what is fact, what is fantasy and what are outright 
lies. There's a monkey flying out of my butt right now. I wonder if the 
science writer lurkers would believe that?
>