The riots in France are probably another NeoCon "false flag" operation.
- Bhairitu Vaj wrote: > Paris Burns Again > > Let's Roast Frankfurters > > > by Fred Reed > > November 7, 2005 > > Paris burns, crackling and popping as merrily as a Yule log when > England was still Merrie and still English. Moslems prance about > setting things alight, cars incinerate briskly, and the police suck > their thumbs. Diversity. Oh yes. And more to come. > > Time and again these days, national governments let in all sorts of > people who belong somewhere else. Pretty soon the country has so many > that the government comes to fear them. At that point the problem > passes beyond easy solution. So politicians paper over everything, > and make concessions to buy a year’s peace. The newcomers breed and > increase. By and by the remaining possibilities are acquiescence or > civil war. > > Which latter, boys and girls, isn’t impossible. > > The assiduously courted invasion usually rests on a curious idealism > that I find hard to credit in adults. The notion is that we are all > just people, brothers under the skin, that all we need is love and > understanding, black and white together, kum bah ya; only a few > reactionary forces need to be stilled to bring about universal bliss. > This happy thought doesn’t surprise me among students in high school. > Politicians aren’t. > > Has no one noticed that diversity doesn’t work? Putting together > peoples with little in common begs for trouble, usually with success. > It is the chief source of the world’s bloodshed and enmity. > > Look around you. Start with Canada, where the Brits and French detest > each other. Drop down to the USA, where black, white, and brown wait > uneasily for no one is sure what; the lid is held on by Washington, > which acts as a sort of federal Tito. There are Hindus and Moslems in > India, Tamils and Sinhalese in Sri Lanka, blacks and whites in South > Africa, Moslems and Buddhists in Thailand, Turks and Germans in > Germany, Vietnamese and Montagnards in Vietnam, Moslems and animists > in the Sudan, Jews and Moslems in Israel, Cambodians and Vietnamese > in Cambodia, Protestants and Catholics in Ireland, Indians and > Mexicans in Chiapas, Basques and Spaniards in Spain, Indians and > Fijians in Fiji. > > But what have facts to do with foreign relations? It is much more > entertaining to base policy on adolescent theories and see what happens. > > When the anticipated melding fails and riots ensue, the response is > to try to buy, or legislate, the impossible. Invariably the cry > arises that the government hasn’t done enough for the indigent > arrivals. We must spend more money on welfare, on schools, on special > programs to raise the unraisable and mix the immiscible. It is our > fault really. We need to change our outmoded attitudes, require > classes on ethnic sensitivity, celebrate the culture of the new > incompatibles. We will have National Islamic History Week, and > children will make mosques from construction paper. That will fix > everything. > > Instead the problem gets worse. The majority population becomes > angrier, but has no recourse. The government is against them. The > immigrants can loot and burn, and nothing is likely to happen to > them: Punishing their misbehavior would engender more violence, which > the government wants to avoid at any cost. If the citizenry defend > themselves, as for example by shooting arsonists, the government will > put them in prison. Citizens have much to lose; the malefactors do not. > > A spring is thus wound. > > Moslems in particular are poison. A failed civilization, Islam sends > its unsuccessful, thus double failures, to Europe. They gravitate to > slums because they can do nothing else. Cohesive, angry, ineffectual, > with no loyalty to their new home, they neither flourish nor > assimilate. Resentment grows among them. And so the cities burn. > > Which is interesting. In the United States, the hostility of Islam is > often attributed to American support of Israel. Beyond doubt, there > is truth in this. It does not explain the riots in Paris, the papered- > over violence in other European countries, the Islamic terrorism in > Russia and in southern Thailand, the anti-Christian fighting in East > Timor, or the terror in Kashmir. Moslems are trouble. > > Immigration is not prima facie a bad idea. It depends on who you let > in. Some immigrants can assimilate. If for example the United States > allows the entry of moderate numbers of reasonably educated Chinese, > nothing untoward will happen. The Chinese share such crucial European > traits as studiousness and respect for law. In fact they are superior > to the white population in both respects. Consequently they arouse > little hostility and not a little admiration. They may congregate for > a generation or so in Chinatown, but the term designates a place > where a lot of Chinese live, not a hostile ghetto. > > Other immigrants cannot assimilate. Most especially practitioners of > Islam cannot prosper in Europe. Watch. > > Incomprehensibly, permitting their entry has been a deliberate > decision. Europe could have kept these swarming newcomers out by > simply not letting them in. No visa, no work permit, instant > deportation. It didn’t. Now France and Holland are on the edge. > Amsterdam could be the next Paris. England, once a delightful land of > safety and civility, becomes in parts a North African slum. I have no > sympathy. They made the choice. But why did they do it? > > For that matter, if Washington wanted to end the illegal immigration > of Latinos, it could do so in a paragraph: Establish a fine of five > thousand dollars a day for employing illegals or renting them > accommodations, half of it to go to the person turning the offender > in; require proof of citizenship for welfare in any form, or use of > the schools; allow police to demand a green card at their discretion; > put the army along the border with orders to shoot. It won’t happen, > of course. I don’t care, but let’s not be surprised at the consequences. > > What the French need to do, but won’t, is to send the army into the > Islamic slums, round up the whole lot, and put them ashore on the > beaches of North Africa with a box lunch and a coupon for three free > Dunkin Donuts. It isn’t a pretty answer. It’s a lot prettier than > what seems to be coming down the pike. > > Ah, but there is the little matter that the enlisted ranks of the > French army are heavily Moslem. Again, the more you let in, the less > you can do about them. For France, I’d guess that the war is over, > though the fighting just begins. > > People and governments by nature temporize, avert their eyes from > forthcoming catastrophe, eschew the needful but unpleasant, and do > not readily believe that the status quo can abruptly change. But it > can, and does, and is. Meanwhile absurd intellectuals write pointless > articles in glossy magazines. Soon it will be too late for civilized > answers. > > Then what? That is the question. > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
