---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :
On 10/02/2014 10:31 AM, salyavin808 wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> mailto:noozguru@... wrote : Jyotish only uses the visible planets not the outer ones. I guess they'd have to, not knowing about the others. Being that Uranus was not discovered until 1781, Neptune 1846 and Jyotish was around centuries before that, yes. But then what if the real use of astrology is to track cycles that occur on earth? IOW, they are just time markers the same way that ancient civilizations tracking time by the Sun and Moon. Pluto would be tracking a 248 year cycle! Bit longer than I'm expecting to be around. But they wouldn't just be tracking, seems to me that they would have to be connected for it be relevant as opposed to just a coincidence. In fact, King Tony joins the planets to bits of the brain, complete bollocks as far as I'm concerned but he's obviously thought about it. Funny thing is his diagram has the outer planets but no link to the brain for them. Could be the worst bit of science I have ever seen. But the really baffling thing for me is the chart itself; someone born in one place has a different effect from the same planets as someone born somewhere else or somewhen else. It's all too hellishly complex that everyone has a different map of life from the same few planets whirling about at the varying distances the manage during their (and our) orbit. But we must be locked in some sort of cycle because I've a niggling feeling we've discussed this before once or twice ;-)
