---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <j_alexander_stanley@...> wrote : He had emailed a few days ago that people were still talking about him on FFL and that it is only fair that he be let back in to respond.
It's Friday afternoon and I need a "I'm not surprised, look at what I wrote a few months ago" moment before the weekend kicks in: It is not that Richard can choose to leave FFL or change the character of his posts: Richard cannot not post on FFL**. To put it another way: If in the very unlikely event that Richard decided that he would like to stop posting or change the nature of his posts, he wouldn't be able to do so. Then he sent in a subscription request, which Rick approved. I have no idea if there was any further communication between Rick and Richard. With respect to Rick, I'm kinda out of the loop; the last time I emailed him about FFL business, I got no response. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <j_alexander_stanley@...> wrote : Don't look at me. When I saw the subscription request, I left it for Rick to handle. Richard made no attempt to conceal his identity, so Rick approved the subscription, knowing fully well who it is. Rick's kind of a softie about stuff like that; after some period of time, he usually lets people back in. Years ago, there was another person who was far more deserving of being permanently booted, and Rick even let him back in. Great. There goes the neighbourhood. What did he put on his request as a reason for joining "I want to turn the place into a crap hole just like the old days with my pig thick remarks"? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote : Rick or Alex, If memory serves this arsehole has been barred from posting. Please send him back to wherever he's been dragging out his miserable existence since he last wasted everyone's time here.