Thanks, co-ops sound very ideal towards a sharing. Though sounds further in 
time a lot like any organizations where things starts off with a membership 
with one-person-one-vote then you get an administrative board elected. And it 
becomes an oligarchy of sorts. 
 

 Like what happened with the New Pioneer Food Coop in Iowa City. Now a few 
high-paid administrator/store-managers working at the board level over the 
membership, high priced food, and a lot of lowly-paid working-poor employees to 
pay for the administrator managers. 
 

 Same thing for this Heartland 'Cooperative' that just built this massive 
multi-million dollar facility for the simple business of unloading and 
re-loading grain on to a monopoly-owned rail-line here with slim chance of 
pay-back. Small group of manager-class running it. Pretty evidently a project 
that an administrative-team put together for itself aside from the membership 
understanding the economics of it so far as pay-back. The membership proly 
would have been better off with that capital returned in dividend. But of 
course there is no job in that for the manager-class. 
 

 Seems co-ops often just go the route of corporations anyway. ..Good for a few 
people at the top once it gets going. Sort of like the Standing Committee over 
communist China.   Or, the TM movement now.
 

 -Buck, a meditator member in a meditating community in Fairfield, Iowa
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jason_green2@...> wrote :

 Buck, you will getter a good understanding from this link 
below.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative

In a cooperative entity, you have only one vote no matter 
how many shares you own. This is one essential difference 
form corporate entity.  Their goal is minimal profits. 
Though, there are some cooperative entities that are 
non-profit and yet do business.


--- <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :

Thanks, really interesting thoughtful posts.

These are secular cooperatives you mention? Where people live together 
communally?
Shared-goods other than just the business? Housing? Meals? Health 
Insurance/care? The aged? Non-spiritual? 
What keeps them together other than their business model?

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jason_green2@...> wrote :

 
'State Communism' was tried and it failed miserably for a 
number of reasons.

It was too simplistic and childish.  No balance between the 
individual and the collective.  First of all, a distinction 
should be made between 'essential goods' and 'non-essential 
goods'.  

Secondly, the success of cooperative entities like Mondragon 
cooperative in Spain and Amul cooperative in india proves 
that 'non-state socialism' is as effective as 'non-state 
capitalism'.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amul https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amul

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Co-operative_Group 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Co-operative_Group

The fact that these 'cooperative entities' are able to 
compete with 'corporate entities', and exist with them side 
by side, even do business with each other, proves that there 
is space for both approaches.

Non-state socialism can exist along with non-state 
capitalism.


--- <noozguru@...> wrote :

 "Communism is an interesting idea that has never been tried."  "What some 
people think are communist countries are family businesses.  North Korea as an 
example."
 

 On 03/25/2015 04:45 AM, jason_green2@... mailto:jason_green2@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

Maintain a distinction between 'generating wealth' and 
 'making money'.  Pro-market capitalism generates wealth. 
 Pro-business capitalism only makes money for a few.
 
 "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of 
 ignorance, and gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the 
 equal sharing of misery"  ~ Winston Churchill 
 
 "Under communism, there is no incentive to supply people 
 with anything they need or want, including safety."
  ~ George Reisman, (Capitalism : A Treatise on Economics 
  1996).
 
 "The trouble is with socialism, which resembles a form of 
 mental illness more than it does a philosophy. Socialists 
 get bees in their bonnets. And because they chronically lack 
 any critical faculty to examine and evaluate their ideas, 
 and because they are pathologically unwilling to consider 
 the opinions of others, and most of all, because socialism 
 is a mindset that regards the individual -- and his rights 
 -- as insignificant, compared to whatever the socialist 
 believes the group needs, terrible, terrible things happen 
 when socialists acquire power."
 ~ L. Neil Smith,  "Cambodian Road Trip", 15 March 2009)
 
 "Communism has sometimes succeeded as a scavenger, but never 
 as a leader. It has never come to power in a country that 
 was not disrupted by war or corruption, or both."
 ~ John F. Kennedy, (Speech at NATO Headquarters, Naples 
 Italy, 2 July 1963)
 
 "Socialism...must have a dictatorship, it will not work 
 without it."
 ~ Mao Zedong, (Dikötter,  The Tragedy of Liberation: A 
 History of the Chinese Revolution, 1945–57)
 
 "I think all the great religions of the world - Buddhism, 
 Hinduism, Christianity, Islam and Communism -- both untrue 
 and harmful."
 ~ Bertrand Russell, (My Religious Reminiscences, 1957) 
 
 "Communism is a doctrine bred of poverty, hatred and strife. 
 Its spread can only be arrested by diminishing the area of 
 poverty and hatred."
 ~ Bertrand Russell, (Portraits From Memory And Other Essays 
 1956)
 
 "Capitalism and communism stand at opposite poles. Their 
 essential difference is this: The communist, seeing the rich 
 man and his fine home says, 'No man should have so much.' 
 The capitalist, seeing the same thing says, 'All men should 
 have as much.' "
 – Phelps Adams
 
 "Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't 
 need it, and hell where they already have it."
 
 ~ Ronald Reagan
 
 "How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads 
 Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's 
 someone who understands Marx and Lenin."
 ~ Ronald Reagan
 
 "Communism is like Prohibition, it's a good idea but it 
 won't work"
 – Will Rogers
 
 "For us in Russia communism is a dead dog. For many people 
 in the West, it is still a living lion."
 – Alexander Solzhenitsyn
 
 "Communism doesn't work because people like to own stuff."
 – Frank Zappa
 
 "Any man who is not a communist at the age of twenty is a 
 fool. Any man who is still a communist at the age of thirty 
 is an even bigger fool."
 ~ George Bernard Shaw
 
 
 
 --- <noozguru@...> mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 Well I guess then you don't know the tech industry which I've worked with for 
years and continue to work with.  Yes it is about money.  Do you own stocks?  
 
 On 03/24/2015 12:26 PM, jason_green2@... mailto:jason_green2@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
 
 
 No, it's not just about money. It's about our survival as a 
 species. It's also about competition, the Russians and the 
 Chinese are not going to stay static.
 
 To calculate the folding structure of a single protein would 
 take one billion years, for all the super-computers on earth 
 combined, right now.  A quantum computer would do that in a 
 few minutes time.
 
 Communism has no moral compass either. It breeds sloth, 
 incompetency, inefficiency, kills merit, encourages 
 mediocrity,  sloppiness etc etc.  I am sure you wouldn't 
 like to live in those old commie countries.
 
 It is inevitable that we eventualy go off this planet. It's 
 the only way that we can survive as a specie. Many cosmic 
 disasters have hit earth and will continue to do so. We 
 merging with AI is the next step in evolution.
 

 
 --- <noozguru@...> mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 Blame capitalism.  It's all about the money.  All the tech companies care 
about is making money because if they don't then their stock will fall and the 
stockholders will complain.  So there is no moral compass asking what is the 
long term effects of the project they are working on.  We could probably just 
stop or slow where we are with technology and be fine for the next several 
hundred years.
 
 On 03/24/2015 11:04 AM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:
 
   He agrees with Hawking and others that AI is not good for humans.
 
 
 Steve Wozniak: The Future of AI Is 'Scary and Very Bad for People'
 
 
 
 
 Steve Wozniak: The Future of AI Is 'Scary and Very Bad... "Will we be the 
gods? Will we be the family pets? Or will we be ants that...


 
 View on www.yahoo.com 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  
 
 

 










  • Re: [FairfieldLife] R... Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
    • [FairfieldLife] ... jason_gre...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • Re: [Fairfie... Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
        • [Fairfie... ultrarishi
          • Re: ... TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
          • [Fai... ultrarishi
          • Re: ... TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
        • [Fairfie... jason_gre...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
          • [Fai... dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
          • [Fai... jason_gre...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
          • [Fai... dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
          • Re: ... Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
          • [Fai... dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
          • [Fai... jason_gre...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
          • [Fai... dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
          • Re: ... Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
          • [Fai... jason_gre...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
          • Re: ... Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
          • [Fai... jason_gre...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
          • Re: ... Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
          • [Fai... jason_gre...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Reply via email to