--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Shankara's comment on BS 2.1.3
> 
> etena yogaH pratyuktaH..2.1.3.. 
> By this [?by refuting saankhya, also] yoga
> is refuted.
> 
> yogapratyuktyadhikaraNam..2.1.3.. 
> 

Let's start from an "easy one":

dvaitino hi te sAMkhyA yogAshca nAtmaikatvadarshinaH.
(without sandhi: dvaitinaH; hi; te; sAMkhyAH; yogAH;
ca; na; aatma[a?]; ekatva-darshinaH)
Note: have no idea why "saankhya" and "yoga" are in plural,
but perhaps they should be translated to "fans" of saankhya, yoga.

Now, lets guess the meaning:

Those "saankhyers" and "yogers" are (phukking) dualists, they 
don't "see" the unity of /aatmaa/ (na aatma-ekatva-darshinaH: not 
self-unity-seeing ones)






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to