---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <olliesedwuz@...> wrote :

 A good question, though it looks like in both cases the speaker is trying to 
provoke a fight, using antisocial behavior and disrespectful language. So,  it 
proves exactly what, if the speaker gets their butt kicked?
 

 I had a similar thought regarding the strength and ugliness of the language 
used in this case - sounds like a button pusher to me. In other words, nothing 
constructive being conveyed other than the speaker wants to get someone riled. 
Of course, whether this would result in a killing is another question although, 
right off the top of my head, I would have to say it should not.  
 Before choosing A or B, I'd want to know why the speaker is expressing 
themselves that way in the first place.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote :

 (A) You're in a Catholic country sitting in a cafe. There are some Christians 
nearby discussing their faith. You interrupt them to say: "I don't know why you 
waste your time with all that crap. The only thing The Bible is good for is 
emergency toilet paper". 

 (B) You're in an Islamic country sitting in a cafe. There are some Muslims 
nearby discussing their faith. You interrupt them to say: "I don't know why you 
waste your time with all that crap. The only thing The Koran is good for is 
emergency toilet paper".
 

 Which of those two situations would you judge to be most likely to end with 
your being hacked to death?
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 The tenents of Christianity are the teachings of Christ. Show me some actual 
quotes, Bible verses, in context, where Christ advocates violence on the part 
of man, towards his fellow man. I read about half of your article and it all 
dealt with men of power, Popes, Kings, etc  justifying their political actions 
in the *name* of Christ.There is a big difference in what Christ actually 
taught and what people actually did in His name. You and the article are 
referring to *justification* of violence but not the actual teaching Christ 
imparts. Can you see the difference? Mohamed, Koran and Haditha actually 
advocate violence and killing and refer to it as a necessary tenent of the 
faith. 

 

 You can check out some of these. Someone has gone to some trouble to find 
these so go ahead and see if any qualify here as "proof" that Jesus could 
sometimes get a little testy.
 

 http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/cruelty/nt_list.html 
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/cruelty/nt_list.html

 

 


 
 snip
 




























































Reply via email to