On 11/02/2015 12:02 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote : On 10/29/2015 11:43 PM, salyavin808 wrote:---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <noozguru@...> <mailto:noozguru@...> wrote : Are some of these scientists insecure or something? I mean, we're getting "scientist" probably in their 20s declaring things and they really haven't had much experience in life. Everyday we get proclamations some which conflict with another group's proclamations the week before. Some are just really, really lame. I would give them a D if I were their professor. I'm intrigued to know what "experience in life" you could have that would make you more likely to know how much matter there is in distant galaxies. Surely it's a matter of measuring gravitational rotation and studying spectroheliographs of emitted light?I'm intrigued by how you misunderstand what the term "experience in life" means. It means "mature thinking". That's why I'm wondering if these ideas are those of millennial scientists. Nice try, but it still doesn't explain how mature" one would need to be to operate data gathereing equipment. PHD level would do just fine.
Having a doctorate degree just means you passed the tests, published a thesis and boards to get one. All that information is generally just theory. Just ask a tenured professor about it. He'll probably tell about all the shitty PhD candidates they get. After they've been out of college a couple years then they begin to learn how the world really works. Didn't you think you knew everything up until you were 30? Or do you still think you know everything because you practiced TM which would give you "the home of all knowledge?" Psst, still doesn't mean you know everything.
Logically the way we see things in nature work of course it is entirely possible there are earth like planets throughout the universe. But why make the stupid statement that this planet is among the first. More likely many, many "Earths" have come and gone. That is a more logical assumption. Not logical at all if you understand the universe to be a particular age and that it took time for stellar processes to create the heavy matter necessary for planets like ours. It's a matter of atomic complexity. The first generation of atoms were 75% hydrogen, it was the supernovae of the first stars that created the next level of complexity by fusing atomic nuclei together to make heavier elements. It takes four generations of stars forming and collapsing to create carbon:However that too is just a theory. There's no "just" about it. We know how atoms are made and what they are made of, know what the universe was made of when it started and we know that stars create heavy matter out of light particles. Unless someone magicked it all into being and our knowledge of particle physics is a coincidence, I would say we have a bonafide explanation.
No, that's just a theory too. It could even be completely wrong! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KThlYHfIVa8
FORMATION OF THE HIGHER MASS ELEMENTS <http://aether.lbl.gov/www/tour/elements/stellar/stellar_a.html> image <http://aether.lbl.gov/www/tour/elements/stellar/stellar_a.html> FORMATION OF THE HIGHER MASS ELEMENTS <http://aether.lbl.gov/www/tour/elements/stellar/stellar_a.html> Formation of the High Mass Elements (What Happens Inside a Star) ABSTRACT Once the universe was created by the Big Bang, the only abundant elements prese... View on aether.lbl.gov <http://aether.lbl.gov/www/tour/elements/stellar/stellar_a.html> Preview by Yahoo On 10/29/2015 02:44 PM, jr_esq@... <mailto:jr_esq@...> [FairfieldLife] wrote:According to a new research by astronomers. Essentially, they're saying consciousness is present everywhere in the universe, which MMY stated in his books. But Carl Sagan supposedly stated that the golden records on the Voyager probe may be found by another intelligent species which have not yet existed today. Or, that the records would eventually wither away in outer space without being discovered by any intelligent beings. Our Planet Is Among the First of Many, Many Earths <http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/10/all-the-future-earths/413017/?utm_source=yahoo> image <http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/10/all-the-future-earths/413017/?utm_source=yahoo> Our Planet Is Among the First of Many, Many Earths <http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/10/all-the-future-earths/413017/?utm_source=yahoo> A new study finds the universe is chock-full of materials for making Earth-like planets, but most of them haven't formed yet. View on www.theatlantic.com <http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/10/all-the-future-earths/413017/?utm_source=yahoo> Preview by Yahoo
