This article says that mindfulness is "squarely based on Buddhism". Nonsense! It has Buddhist roots but in no way is it religious, and for that reason is acceptable to researchers enclaves of academic liberalism such as the East and West Coast (Boston, Bay Area, etc). TM otoh, (if one includes the Puja), might easily disqualify it as a serious stress-busting technique, since the bleeding-heart liberals of the Stanford area could easily point to the words, "Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva....". In the academic arenas, in the contest between mindfulness and TM, I predict that mindfulness will be the clear winner. No Ivory-Tower scholar in Boston or at Stanford would risk his career on being aligned in any way with a technique that requires mention of "Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva...." And for the record, I'm a TM practitioner. http://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/11/whats-wrong-with-mindfulness-more-than-you-might-think/ http://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/11/whats-wrong-with-mindfulness-more-than-you-might-think/
[FairfieldLife] The Cult of Mindfulness
yifux...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:28:42 -0700