HuffPo is in the tank for Bernie, of course. And I know RT isn't Pravda nor Izvestia. But it isn't the most reliable source of news and information, and it isn't surprising that it would prefer Bernie over Clinton.
Also, so far nobody has been seriously attacking Bernie, whereas Clinton has been a target for decades. Regardless of what Trump did, Republican attacks on Bernie would be massive and merciless. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote : OMG! Are you still stuck in the 1950s? Everyone here knows RT stands for Russian Times. Many have posted articles from it. It's not Pravda nor Izvestia. It's good source of alternative news compared to the US corporate run media. Besides one source of info is from that well known conservative rag "Huffington Post". :-D The democratic socialist would beat the billionaire Republican 51-to-38 percent, based on aggregated polling data on the Huffington Post, whereas a Rasmussen poll this week shows Clinton losing to Trump 41-to-39 percent. If the election is election is Trump versus Clinton, all the Donald has to do is play a prosecuting attorney. He can't do that with Bernie. And they are on the same page with some things. Now that would be a much more worthwhile election. On 05/04/2016 11:06 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: FWIW, the "RT" in the link below stands for "Russia Times." Rassmussen, the poll the article cites as measuring Trump beating Hillary, leans conservative and has a reputation for being inaccurate. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> mailto:noozguru@... wrote : A surprise victory for Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders in the Indiana primary Tuesday puts focus on how well he’s doing in the polls against the now-presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump as compared to Hillary Clinton. https://www.rt.com/usa/341798-indiana-upset-sanders-trump-clinton/ https://www.rt.com/usa/341798-indiana-upset-sanders-trump-clinton/
