---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
How many does it take? How many does it take to what?? And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it? As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have her day in court. At least she'll have one. I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be paid off to withdraw the suit and keep silent. Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : The women's stories that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too many. How many have accused him of rape? And those that have made such charges, didn't exactly give him his reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests. So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 13 years old, right? It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the charge is flimsy or nonexistent. That story has been out for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound so bad. Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad. Did you listen to her taped interview? Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all confidence in them she said. Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically? Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case. Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled. Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial (understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced the sentence. She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds like one of those sniper stories. Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got stuck with it. Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and punished without making the best possible case. If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear Hillary with her involvement in this case. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : Clinton raped older women and molested them. And the proof is...? Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it. You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth: FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate. View on www.snopes.com http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ Preview by Yahoo From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits