What difference does it make? False pretenses - almost everyone posting here 
is using an alias, yourself included.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

 You may be right, but I'm dubious. Ananda's misinformation could only have 
come from the Closet folks, and they sure wouldn't allow Vox/yogi_ 
dude/anon_alias to join, nor would they take very long to recognize and ban him 
if he managed to join under false pretenses. Also, ananda is clearly a 
Barryfan, which Vox/etc. never has been (understatement!). Their styles (I use 
the term loosely) are vaguely similar, but their trolling approach--in 
particular their stated concerns--is quite different. Finally, Vox/etc. just 
isn't clever enough to pull off such an elaborate impersonation. 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 My guess is that ananda and Vox are one and the same. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

 I could be wrong, but I don't think ananda_das_gupta is the same person as Vox 
and yogi dude. anon_alias is, however. 

 I do believe ananda_das_gupta is a member of and has been getting his 
(mis)information from The_Closet. He has no way of knowing what liars the other 
members are, especially about FFL history.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 
 You got banned from the MUM campus for being a "free-thinker", but I'm being 
"trollish" for agreeing with the moderator about the banning and shunning on 
campus?
 

 I'll humor you and give you the attention you apparently require. At this 
point I have no idea what you are asking but that is quite the catch phrase 
"banning and shunning". I like it. Now, here is your virtual hug - 'HUGZ'. Here 
is a tip: instead of repeating yourself asking rhetorical and endless loop 
questions perhaps you should check out "The Water Closet" over where the boys 
are conglomerating. They love repetition over there when they're not preening 
themselves. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote :

 He just doesn't seem to like to be left out of any party. I think the giveaway 
is the inability not to keep repeating himself over and over a if he hasn't 
heard what the other person has written. I think that might be termed 
'trollish' in the old vernacular.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <salsunshineiniowa@...> wrote :

 Seriously?  This is him too?  How many aliases does that make that he's using 
concurrently?  I count 3: this one, vox and yogi dude.  A record!
 

 Sal
 
 On Sep 9, 2016, at 9:51 PM, olliesedwuz@... mailto:olliesedwuz@... 
[FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 last I heard, he was headed over to your place, Tex.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 
 So, you don't want to talk about the banning and shunning. What happened to 
Doug, the moderator, who was complaining about the banning and shunning - the 
guy who started this thread?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<olliesedwuz@...> wrote :

 Enough questions for now, you precocious four year old. Time for your nap...
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 
 So, how many have been banned from the Dome? Apparently none of the FFL 
moderators are in good standing with the TM Org. One was actually banned, right?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<sharelong60@...> wrote :

 Wrong! I was an active poster to FFL and have not been banned from Dome, MUM 
campus, etc.
 

 ananda_das_gupta <no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com> 
 

 So, you called them on their "shit" and you are an adult. And, there are no 
victims from banning and shunning at the MUM campus. It's a matter of personal 
choice, to get banned from the Dome. I would suppose that everyone posting to 
FFL has been banned from the MUM campus, right?
 

 So, why is Doug, the moderator, so upset? 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<olliesedwuz@...> wrote :

 FFL2 is very much active, if you care to join and post there. The ones who 
caused so much trouble here went to FFL2, until they got called on their shit, 
and made tracks, willingly. We are all adults here, making our own decisions. 
There aren't any victims. Those who have chosen to exclude themselves did it by 
choice, without any prompting. As for those booted from FFL for inadequate 
social skills, live and learn. 

So, howz about some of that "controversial spirituality" from you, huh? Let's 
see how much you are banned, shunned, stalked and harassed after sharing 
it...but I won't be holding my breath. Your fantasy doesn't hold up. 

There are mostly those who get along in the world, and there are a few fuck 
ups. The fuck ups unfortunately leak their garbage onto others, and for that 
reason are not welcome here. Get it? Could be a site about *shoes* and the same 
rules apply.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 One of the other FFL moderators created a "free speech" zone on Yahoo Groups, 
but, it looks like they were shut down by cyber stalkers, following them around 
on the internet. 

 Kicked out of the Dome and banned from campus - shunned. Banned from FFL and 
stalked. This just doesn't appear to be much of a spiritual group. Now that's 
ironic!
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<awoelflebater@...> wrote :

 Well, at least FFL and Doug aren't like The Corner where there is a bouncer at 
the door with a prepared list of those who can't even get in the room. Talk 
about censorship and lack of free speech. In addition, you can't even read 
anything there unless you are on the list of approved individuals. And the guy 
who started that forum and those who are in attendance were the ones giving 
Doug a hard time about the lack of free speech at FFL. Too ironic to be 
believed. Luckily, since I know everyone over there and have heard what they 
have to say about a hundred times I'm not remotely interested in getting 
admitted. Some things just don't get better with age.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<olliesedwuz@...> wrote :

 In Doug's defense, not one person has *ever* been banned from FFL for not 
meeting his definition of "spiritual".

The reason a few were banned, is that they lacked basic social skills, and were 
more interested in being a pain in the ass, vs. contributing anything of 
substance. Had nothing to do with content, and everything to do with not 
playing well with others, due to immaturity, a lack of manners, and no 
self-discipline.

Perhaps you could quit making shit up? Thanks in advance...///////
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 What you may not realize is that the way you're running this discussion forum 
is just like they run the Dome - banning and shunning people that don't meet 
your definition of spiritual.
 

 You're obviously selling TM and using your position as FFL moderator to 
enforce guidelines "as a primary retributive tool to discipline a sales force."
 

 Maybe you could set us straight by answering a few questions.
 

 What is your exact position, if any, with MUM?
 

 Are you a re-certified TM teacher in good standing with the TM Org?
 

 Did you graduate from the university, and if not, why not?
 

 Sometimes, you seem to be posting under various aliases. Why is that?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :

 This kind of thing is just bad irony and publicity for what is going on here.  

 It is plenty past time to just go and gut the Dome guidelines of the 
‘non-compete’ clauses particularly around the practice of jyotish.  Fairfield 
is full of people secretly promoting and practicing jyotish and giving 
readings.   Every time the Weekly Reader boldly publishes astrology from David 
Hawthorne it is a reminder of how he and his family in moving to Fairfield to 
be part of something larger were ridiculously judged and screwed by the 
movement. This is just plain bad for the energetics of the community here.  

 Everyone gets the irony of going to Pat Hayward for consultation too.  
Everyone at all levels of the ™ movement does it.  

 It is quite time to stop using the Dome badge guidelines as weapon-ry against 
the community.  IThis has been Self-destructive all along.  The Dome badge 
guidelines need to be made much simpler to what it simply takes to run a group 
meditation and stop using the Dome badge guidelines as a primary retributive 
tool to discipline a sales force; let administration of a sales force of the 
re-cert TM teachers be the particular dealings of an HR or legal departments 
for the teaching side [Maharishi Foundation] of the movement.  

 It is time to damn and dump those ‘non-compete’ clauses around the practice of 
jyotish. 
 

 -JaiGuruYou














 



















 




 
  














Reply via email to