Kessler? Here's a review of this book.....All kinds of errors...he sounds like an angry gossip make-up artist to me. Based on your belief on her manners stated below, here is what he wrote on Al Gore in the book. Hmmmm........
"About former Vice President Al Gore, he quotes a former agent named Jeff Crane, who says that he was "on the detail one Christmas when Gore was at home in Carthage. Neighbors offered us food on Christmas Day, but the Gores never even bothered to say 'Merry Christmas' or 'Thank you." Surely Crane said this. But Crane was never part of Gore's detail...." The weird inaccuracies in Ronald Kessler's new book on the Secret Service http://theweek.com/articles/444781/weird-inaccuracies-ronald-kesslers-new-book-secret-service http://theweek.com/articles/444781/weird-inaccuracies-ronald-kesslers-new-book-secret-service The weird inaccuracies in Ronald Kessler's new book ... http://theweek.com/articles/444781/weird-inaccuracies-ronald-kesslers-new-book-secret-service Kessler should question the judgment of some of his own sources View on theweek.com http://theweek.com/articles/444781/weird-inaccuracies-ronald-kesslers-new-book-secret-service Preview by Yahoo ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : Right, one corrupt former agent whom the rest of the service repudiates. No, there are at least two books out there by former SS agents. Corrupt? Why, because they told all? Don't forget the State Troopers that were bodyguards in Arkansas. From Ronald Kesslers book First Family Details: "When in public,Hillary smiles and acts graciously." Kessler explains, "As soon as the cameras are gone, her angry personality, nastiness and imperiousness become evident". He added: "Hillary Clinton can make Richard Nixon look like Mahatma Gandhi." He said she is rude to SS and others, cussed Secret Service drivers, never said *thank you* .He goes on and on. BTW, it wasn't the *rest* of the Secret Service that repudiated Gary Byrne. It was a few high ranking members that denied his book, much of which he got was from other agents.I would think telling all on the Clintons would not be good for job security. Might be difficult to bump -off a Srecret Service agent though. Repudiating those that do *tell all* would be job security. Sorry Judy, declaring victory doesn't make you victorious. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] It's Looking Good You are really not doing so well, Mike. Your attempted comebacks are getting weaker and weaker. You know how psittacines regurgitate their food when they get a crop infection? The regurgitated material is a disgusting slimy mass. Same with parroted slime from the right wing. It's truly repulsive and a symptom of serious illness. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : Oh yes, the Secret Service is especially fond of looking out for her! From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:12 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] It's Looking Good That's only in public. Just about without exception, everyone who has worked with her (including Republicans) says she's warm and caring and funny and charming and exceptionally likeable. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : She has to look *likeable*, which she is not. That's like asking nurse Ratchet to look and act likeable. From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] It's Looking Good ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <salsunshineiniowa@...> wrote : (snip) There’s really only one way Hillary could lose this debate IMO, and that’s if she pulls a Gore and tried to play down her own massive intelligence and experience in an attempt to make Trump look smarter than he is. Why anyone would do that is of course the big question, which I’m sure still leaves psychologists scratching their heads about Gore and his first debate to this day. Gore wasn't so much trying to make Bush look smarter. Gore had been brutally mocked for being too wonkish and was portrayed as stiff and boring, and he was attempting to counter that image. Hillary actually has a similar problem. She needs to come across as human and charming as well as intelligent and experienced. Not fair, but that's the way it is. At this point I think all the debates are striving to do is capture the approval and votes of all of those independents and/or former Bernie supporters who are leaning towards Jill or Gary. The Hillary supporters are going to stay Hillary supporters and Trump supporters are going to keep enabling a sociopath no matter what happens at the debates. It would take some sort of miracle for Trump's base to abandon him. It will be very interesting to see what happens and how the polls are effected after the debate based on performance. That should give us a hint as to how important the debates are and how many undecideds there actually are/were out there pre-debate. http://theweek.com/articles/444781/weird-inaccuracies-ronald-kesslers-new-book-secret-service http://theweek.com/articles/444781/weird-inaccuracies-ronald-kesslers-new-book-secret-service The weird inaccuracies in Ronald Kessler's new book ... http://theweek.com/articles/444781/weird-inaccuracies-ronald-kesslers-new-book-secret-service Kessler should question the judgment of some of his own sources View on theweek.com http://theweek.com/articles/444781/weird-inaccuracies-ronald-kesslers-new-book-secret-service Preview by Yahoo ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : Right, one corrupt former agent whom the rest of the service repudiates. No, there are at least two books out there by former SS agents. Corrupt? Why, because they told all? Don't forget the State Troopers that were bodyguards in Arkansas. From Ronald Kesslers book First Family Details: "When in public,Hillary smiles and acts graciously." Kessler explains, "As soon as the cameras are gone, her angry personality, nastiness and imperiousness become evident". He added: "Hillary Clinton can make Richard Nixon look like Mahatma Gandhi." He said she is rude to SS and others, cussed Secret Service drivers, never said *thank you* .He goes on and on. BTW, it wasn't the *rest* of the Secret Service that repudiated Gary Byrne. It was a few high ranking members that denied his book, much of which he got was from other agents.I would think telling all on the Clintons would not be good for job security. Might be difficult to bump -off a Srecret Service agent though. Repudiating those that do *tell all* would be job security. Sorry Judy, declaring victory doesn't make you victorious. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] It's Looking Good You are really not doing so well, Mike. Your attempted comebacks are getting weaker and weaker. You know how psittacines regurgitate their food when they get a crop infection? The regurgitated material is a disgusting slimy mass. Same with parroted slime from the right wing. It's truly repulsive and a symptom of serious illness. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : Oh yes, the Secret Service is especially fond of looking out for her! From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:12 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] It's Looking Good That's only in public. Just about without exception, everyone who has worked with her (including Republicans) says she's warm and caring and funny and charming and exceptionally likeable. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : She has to look *likeable*, which she is not. That's like asking nurse Ratchet to look and act likeable. From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] It's Looking Good ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <salsunshineiniowa@...> wrote : (snip) There’s really only one way Hillary could lose this debate IMO, and that’s if she pulls a Gore and tried to play down her own massive intelligence and experience in an attempt to make Trump look smarter than he is. Why anyone would do that is of course the big question, which I’m sure still leaves psychologists scratching their heads about Gore and his first debate to this day. Gore wasn't so much trying to make Bush look smarter. Gore had been brutally mocked for being too wonkish and was portrayed as stiff and boring, and he was attempting to counter that image. Hillary actually has a similar problem. She needs to come across as human and charming as well as intelligent and experienced. Not fair, but that's the way it is. At this point I think all the debates are striving to do is capture the approval and votes of all of those independents and/or former Bernie supporters who are leaning towards Jill or Gary. The Hillary supporters are going to stay Hillary supporters and Trump supporters are going to keep enabling a sociopath no matter what happens at the debates. It would take some sort of miracle for Trump's base to abandon him. It will be very interesting to see what happens and how the polls are effected after the debate based on performance. That should give us a hint as to how important the debates are and how many undecideds there actually are/were out there pre-debate.
