The hideous, diabolical truth about Hillary Clinton https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2016/10/14/the-hideous-diabolical-truth-about-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.db1aac6a1448 https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2016/10/14/the-hideous-diabolical-truth-about-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.db1aac6a1448 The hideous, diabolical truth about Hillary Clinton https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2016/10/14/the-hideous-diabolical-truth-about-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.db1aac6a1448 It's been a busy life! View on www.washingtonpost... https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2016/10/14/the-hideous-diabolical-truth-about-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.db1aac6a1448 Preview by Yahoo
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : Honestly Bhairitu, I don't remember that but she doesn't have a good record for thirty years of *pubic service*. What has she accomplished? Every thing she has done as Secretary of State has been a failure that has led to the worst refugee crisis Western Europe has witnessed and feels guilty enough about it to want to bring hundreds of thousands of those refugees here. Zero trust worthiness. Corrupt as hell.The only way she can look any better is to try to tear Trump down below her, which she has the aid of the media to help. As Trump said, she couldn't be elected dog catcher without the support of the media. Check the Wikileaks e-mails to substantiate that. From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2016 11:29 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question Hey Mike! Didn't I say a while back that if Hillary was the nominee the campaign would be about character and not issues? If Bernie got the nomination it would be about issues? Look at the degeneration of the American consciousness. Some states (including California) you can write in a choice. There is a move in those states to write in Bernie as a protest vote. Of course we have our resident "shamer" troll who tries shame anyone who has a liberal view if they quote a "right wing source" even if that source is correct. Shame on that troll! On 10/15/2016 04:51 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: If Trump fondled my balls, I wouldn't have gone public but I would have immediately reported it to police and asked for an investigation and police report verifying that I did report it. You are, apparently, unable to grasp what it takes to stand up to such intimidation and wealth as Trump can wield even though, in reality, he is a pitiable loser. Now you know how the Clinton sexual victims feel! What kind of power does a woman have against the Attorney General/ Governor of a state or a President have, especially when his wife sends out Lawyers from the Rose Law Firm to threaten and silence the victims. From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" mailto:awoelflebater@...[FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote : That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you are busted for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, but louder. The problem here is that Bill Clinton's accusers, accused him almost immediately. Trump's accusers, accused as much as thirty years later. Silent till now. Trump has been a public figure for some thirty years or longer and never accused publicly of these things and never called a racist until he ran against a Democrat. This is their *play book*. BTW, he was a Democrat when he supposedly did these things, thus it wasn't his fault, he was a victim of a *patriarchal society*up bringing. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Remember when Bill Clinton perjured himself and all we heard was, "it's just about sex" Also, there are wholes big enough to drive an 18 wheeler through in some of these stories. The fact that Wikileaks is exposing the medias bias and compliance and coordination with the Hillary campaign says enough. I dare you t! o say that if Trump had fondled your balls that you would have gone public or legal on him. I don't believe you have the money or the chutzpah to have taken him on in the face of such an affront given his power and wealth. There is safety in numbers and it seems that at some point enough is enough for these women. You obviously have no idea of the kind of legal and financial sway he has over people. He is as eager to sic his lawyers on those who confront him as you are to vilify Hillary. From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:52 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] One Question So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the hell? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
