Your statement that animals can't collapse the wave function is false. Between your statements and Wikipedia, I'll go by Wiki. Among 8 principle "Collapse of the Wave function" (enter into Wiki), 4 assume it (but do not prove it); while 4 render it redundant and/or unnecessary.
The first part of your paragraph seems to suggest that you "KNOW' that roosters can't collapse wave functions and that only humans can. Yet I find no corroboration for this anywhere. What's your reference, apart from you're pulling ridiculous statements out of the top of your head.?? Why not chimps. What sets Chimps apart from humans in regard to collapsing wave functions? What is the distinctive property of humans (and not chimps), that makes humans unique in this regard? Be specific. So far, the only corroborating evidence you have for your statements is that you say it. (i.e. no evidence at all). When making totally absurd statements such as "only humans can collapse wave functions", it's best to have some evidence. What's your evidence? Please cite any reference online and I'll take a look at it. Note that the 8 "INTERPRETATIONS" below are called that since no single Interpretation amounts to a preemptive body of proof. All are hypotheses. Yet you say you know for sure. That's bizarre! The existence of the wave function collapse is required in the Copenhagen interpretation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation the objective collapse interpretations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objective_collapse_interpretation the transactional interpretation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation the von Neumann interpretation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretation_of_quantum_mechanics#von_Neumann.2FWigner_interpretation:_consciousness_causes_the_collapse in which consciousness causes collapse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness_causes_collapse. On the other hand, the collapse is considered a redundant or optional approximation in the Consistent histories - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_histories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_histories Consistent histories - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_histories In quantum mechanics, the consistent histories[1] (also referred to as decoherent histories[2]) approach is intended to give a modern interpretation of quantum mech... View on en.wikipedia.org https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_histories Preview by Yahoo approach, self-dubbed "Copenhagen done right" the Bohm interpretation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohm_interpretation the many-worlds interpretation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation the ensemble interpretation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ensemble_interpretation
