Those pundit program meditators here on H1-B visas or trying to get in on such 
a visa (or did the TMO stop that program?) may be at risk...

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :

 Have any meditators been deported by this exec action? 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <emily.mae50@...> wrote :

 
 Maybe you should read the 1965 law that clearly doesn't give the President the 
authority to do what he did. And certainly one reason he'd lose at the Supreme 
Court level. There would be no tie; he would lose.  He's lost twice so far.  
And he knows it.  So, he has to rewrite to save face, or double down and waste 
millions of dollars and his political capital losing.  He's not going to take 
that risk with this particular Executive Order.  
 

 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/27/opinion/trumps-immigration-ban-is-illegal.html?_r=0
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/27/opinion/trumps-immigration-ban-is-illegal.html?_r=0

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Trumps nominee will not be seated for months. The latest I've heard is that he 
plans to re-write the Executive Order because while taking it to the SC, there 
is a chance that it could end up in a tie, leaving the 9th Circus Court of 
Appeals decision to stand. So, it's just easier to re-write the order 
addressing the court's *concerns*.
 Actually, it's the 9th Circus that is *testing* the constitution. Maybe you 
should read the 1952 statute that clearly gives the President the authority to 
do what he did.
 A bill is currently being drafted in Congress to break-up the 9th Circus into 
two or more circuits.


 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 10:32 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] See You at the Supreme Court
 
 
   
 The Appeals Court refused to uphold Trump's travel ban.  But he wants to fight 
it at the highest court in the land.  So, the fight goes on.  Meanwhile, the 
nation is divided and in turmoil.  Trump is gambling that his recent nominee 
will cast the winning vote for his travel ban. He is testing the Constitution 
to the limit.  Who will win?
 

 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/appeals-court-decision-trump-travel-ban-coming-thursday-221158821.html
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/appeals-court-decision-trump-travel-ban-coming-thursday-221158821.html?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 

 

 


 


 














Reply via email to