Substantive correction: 

 Re:"Now Sessions is refusing public testimony."  Rated: "False"—I was 
referencing an old article.  
 

 Doug, I hear you.  You don't want any discussion of national politics on this 
forum.  The exchanges were cordial however, imho. There was no reactive 
"triggering" happening.  
 

 Remember this? "The personal is political." 
 

 The phrase was popularized by the publication of a 1969 essay by feminist 
Carol Hanisch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_Hanisch under the title "The 
Personal is Political" in 1970

 

 Carol Hanisch, a member of New York Radical Women 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Radical_Women and a prominent figure in 
the Women's Liberation Movement 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_Liberation_Movement, drafted an article 
defending the political importance of consciousness-raising groups 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness-raising_groups in February 1969 in 
Gainesville, Florida.

 

 Seems like politics (personal, local, and national) is tied to existence and 
inextricably to spirituality.  Hmmmm.......do you agree?  As such, perhaps 
"politics is spiritual" and thus meets your criteria.
 

 In the meantime, I'll pursue life in other locations.  Have a good day.  Em.   
 
   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <emily.mae50@...> wrote :

 Again, how do you know that, as of last week there wasn't any evidence that 
"anyone knew of."  Comey apparently knew of a 3rd meeting Sessions had with the 
Russians that he lied about, for example.  Now Sessions is refusing public 
testimony.  Do you think that his private testimony will be leaked?  Do you 
think Comey's will be?  You have absolutely no idea what those involved in 
ongoing investigations know.  Maybe Robert Mueller's findings will give 
evidence; did you think of that, yet?  How do you know that "every other thing 
leaks?"  You don't have any idea what the whole of anything is!   

 The soap opera you follow is very poorly scripted.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Funny how every other thing *leaks*.
 Who has the evidence, which will eventually be released to the public?

 As of last week, there wasn't any evidence .... that anyone knew of.
 


 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2017 10:09 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump
 
 
   Again, the investigations are not complete and as such the evidence has not 
been released to the public.  
 

 Here are some possibilities in the event that "collusion" is proven.
 

 
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2017/may/31/gregg-jarrett/fox-news-hosts-wrong-no-law-forbids-russia-trump-c/
 
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2017/may/31/gregg-jarrett/fox-news-hosts-wrong-no-law-forbids-russia-trump-c/
 

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 So tell us what they have uncovered. What laws were broken and what is the 
evidence that involves Trump or his campaign?
 
 


 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2017 12:54 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump

 
   Again, not possible that you would know ahead of the conclusion of the 
investigation(s) in progress. (The operative phrase here is *in progress.*)  
Are you really trying to tell me that you are basing your conclusions on what 
the couple of people that have provided public testimony have said so far?  
Seriously?  You are livin' in a dreamworld.....
 

 

 These investigations, however, can be broken down into three categories:
 First, the intertwined Justice Department investigation, now led by a special 
counsel, into the ties between the Trump campaign and Russia and, reportedly, 
the possible cover-up. Second, the investigations led by the House and Senate 
Intelligence Committees, which are broadly looking at Russian intervention in 
the 2016 election. Third, the Senate Judiciary Committee and House Oversight 
and Government Reform Committee have been looking into former National Security 
Adviser Michael Flynn’s conduct specifically — and have recently expanded their 
inquiry to the circumstances surrounding former FBI Director James Comey’s 
firing. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 When I say *everyone* , I'm referring to the heads of the various agencies 
that have been leading the investigations and are in a position to know, that 
have testified. Clapper , Comey and a few others last week all said there is no 
evidence of Collusion or Obstruction by Trump and that he was *not* a target of 
their investigations.. Now of course CNN  et al will find some anonymous source 
or sources that can't be questioned to say otherwise.
 
 


 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 11:39 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump

 
   Again, not the case.  "Everyone that has been involved" has not said any 
such thing.  You do not know who all has been involved, because the 
investigations have not concluded.  Have we heard from Bob Mueller yet, for 
example? Have we heard from the different congressional investigations that are 
*ongoing*? 
 

 It seems that your information sources are divorced from reality and 
reflecting a one-sided illusion that you have bought into and are parroting 
here.  
 

 I did not say at any time that I was certain there is a crime or that there 
isn't a crime that has been committed. What I said was that "more will be 
revealed" and that we do not know what the pattern of evidence will show, yet.  
I am not a lawyer and neither are you.  
 

 Yes, we will see......
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 I do know that everyone that has been involved has said there is no evidence 
of tampering or collusion. If you are so certain that there was a crime, what 
was the crime and what is the evidence? We've all been waiting to see or hear.

 

 
 


 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 9:37 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump

 
   Again, you are coming to summary conclusions before the investigations have 
completed.  You have no idea what the pattern of evidence will show in the end 
or what all the evidence is.  You are just caught up in the grind of watching 
the daily "soap opera."

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Comey never said Trump committed *obstruction of justice*. There is no 
evidence of obstruction, or collusion with the Russians as stated by Clapper, 
Comey and others that were interrogated by congress just last week. Zero, Zip, 
Nada!

 When Trump told Comey that he *hoped* he would let Flynn off or go, Comey took 
it as an instruction. That is his personal view which is purely subjective. The 
English language dictates that is a hope for an outcome. Not illegal or a 
dictate.

 
 If John is referring to Al Green as the congressman righting up articles of 
impeachment, the man is a fool like Maxine Waters and Sheila Jackson Lee. He 
doesn't even know what the charges would be.I would be surprised if the 
majority of his constituents graduated high school.



 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 12:56 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump

 
   John, are you saying that in the public testimony "Comey just said that 
Trump committed obstruction of justice and a federal crime.?"  You must not be 
talking literally.  I'm pretty gosh darn positive he didn't say either such 
thing.  However, I feel your pain.  
 

 Here's a good article on impeachment.  Impeachment does not mean removal.  The 
likelihood that Trump will be removed through the impeachment process is slim 
to none, imho.  
 

 
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/12/15615066/impeachment-trump-process-history

 

 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_esq@...> wrote :

 
 

Emily,
 

 Comey has stated so in the article shown.  I'm sure he knows how to present 
his evidence to support his point.  Also, he has an ax to grind since he was 
fired by Trump.  For the senators in the committee, it will be hard for them 
ignore the details of his testimony.  All of these things are recorded and 
filmed which is available to all investigative reporters and all politicians.
 

 There's already a Democratic congressman who has crafted the steps needed to 
impeach Trump.  It's only a matter of time when the snowball effect will take 
over the political climate in DC.  And, it looks grim for Trump.
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <emily.mae50@...> wrote :

 jr, Comey didn't say either of those things, I don't believe.  We are a long 
ways from impeachment.  

 There is no final conclusion yet on whether obstruction or collusion occurred. 
 Trump has most definitely not been "virtually cleared of any wrong doing."  
Multiple investigations are still ongoing, yes?  More will be revealed.   

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_esq@...> wrote :

 
 

MD,
 

 Comey just said that Trump committed obstruction of justice and a federal 
crime which are punishable by impeachment.  His testimony as an ex-FBI chief 
cannot be brushed aside easily by the Senators in the committee.  This could 
become another Watergate for those who are looking for significance and 
historical comparison.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 John
 I'm sure you couldn't see how he was elected either.
 Trump has been virtually cleared of any wrong doing.
 He was never under investigation and there is no evidence of any collusion 
with the *Russians* and no evidence of obstruction of justice.
I know this has got to be pissing the media and democrats off but these are the 
facts.

 
 


 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2017 12:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump

 
   
 Comey's testimony today has caused a flurry of questions against Trump's 
personal and management style.  He appears to be playing the "ratings" game to 
keep his job as president.  I don't see any positive angle for Trump to save 
his job/gig at the White House.
 

 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/live-coverage-james-comey-senate-testimony-153308399.html

 

 


 























  

 


 













 















 














 
  


 















 
 

 
  



 


 













Reply via email to