Yogananda's SRF passes to a second-generation leadership, someone who never met 
Yogananda... 

 SRF Announces New President 
 

 Brother Chidananda Elected President and Spiritual Head of SRF/YSS 
 


 
 
http://www.yogananda-srf.org/NewsArchive/2017/SRF_Announces_New_President.aspx#.WdFuk3eGNo4
 
http://www.yogananda-srf.org/NewsArchive/2017/SRF_Announces_New_President.aspx#.WdFuk3eGNo4

 

 


 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 
 Generational-wisdom.. 

 Technically in Maharishi's founding and with Hagelin and others having worked 
directly alongside Maharishi they would be first generation of ™ and their 
working now (post-founder) to consolidate things towards a (demographic) 
turnover at some point to second generation meditators, generations coming who 
have never directly seen or met Maharishi.  Thus far the microphone has not 
been shared or handed to a second generation to hold nor is a second generation 
much present in upper level policy circles. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 

 Of “second-generation” wisdom.. as Noyes frames it below, Will John Hagelin 
now of his own ‘first-generation’ wisdom turn out to be the consolidator to 
something that may last some decades more? ..   Excerpts from the 1966 
Introduction by Mark Holloway  to the Dover edition, History Of American 
Socialisms, Noyes 1869 “At the time when Noyes was alive (19th Century) any 
marked deviation from the established churches of Christianity was likely to 
provoke a vigorous reaction.  Consequently initiators and leaders of sects had 
to be men of exceptionally strong character, especially if they were 
evangelically minded, for then they had to be capable of keeping the allegiance 
of their original members and of winning converts even in the midst of 
antagonism or actual physical persecution. 

 A fanatic might get this far, might indeed get further, as Ann Lee got to 
America from Lancashire and Joseph Smith got to Nauvoo; but other qualities 
were required in order to maintain the initial impetus.  As well as the 
absolute conviction that they and they alone had chosen the right path, and the 
ability to persuade others that this was so, leaders of this kind needed 
exceptional organizing ability and foresight, balanced judgment, and a quality 
that can best be described as “intuitive astuteness”. Joseph Meacham, who 
organized the Shakers into communities, and Brigham Young, who commanded the 
Mormon hegira, must have been endowed with these qualities; and no doubt other 
examples of “second-generation” wisdom of this kind could be cited.  It was a 
characteristic that was less common among initiators, 

 'second-generation' wisdom, ..simple vision, the strength of character and the 
evangelical fire of the fanatical initiator were blended with the balanced 
judgment and practical managerial capacity of the successful consolidator.  
This was an unusual combination of characteristics; and in view of (his) 
background , his absolute rejection of orthodoxy was also unusual. 

 ..He was extreme, but logical and realistic; revolutionary, but not violent. 
When religious fire, moral courage, and good judgment ..have all been given due 
credit, something remains unexplained--some ingredient of the personality--. I 
think that this unnamed quality can without sentimentality be called “love of 
life.”  ..I believe Noyes, unlike many sectarians, was a great yea-sayer, an 
enhancer of life,” 

 

 

 








 
 

   
 


 
 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 
 Generational-wisdom.. 

 Technically in Maharishi's founding and with Hagelin and others having worked 
directly alongside Maharishi they would be first generation of ™ and their 
working now (post-founder) to consolidate things towards a (demographic) 
turnover at some point to second generation meditators, generations coming who 
have never directly seen or met Maharishi.  Thus far the microphone has not 
been shared or handed to a second generation to hold nor is a second generation 
much present in upper level policy circles. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 

 Of “second-generation” wisdom.. as Noyes frames it below, Will John Hagelin 
now of his own ‘first-generation’ wisdom turn out to be the consolidator to 
something that may last some decades more? ..   Excerpts from the 1966 
Introduction by Mark Holloway  to the Dover edition, History Of American 
Socialisms, Noyes 1869 “At the time when Noyes was alive (19th Century) any 
marked deviation from the established churches of Christianity was likely to 
provoke a vigorous reaction.  Consequently initiators and leaders of sects had 
to be men of exceptionally strong character, especially if they were 
evangelically minded, for then they had to be capable of keeping the allegiance 
of their original members and of winning converts even in the midst of 
antagonism or actual physical persecution. 

 A fanatic might get this far, might indeed get further, as Ann Lee got to 
America from Lancashire and Joseph Smith got to Nauvoo; but other qualities 
were required in order to maintain the initial impetus.  As well as the 
absolute conviction that they and they alone had chosen the right path, and the 
ability to persuade others that this was so, leaders of this kind needed 
exceptional organizing ability and foresight, balanced judgment, and a quality 
that can best be described as “intuitive astuteness”. Joseph Meacham, who 
organized the Shakers into communities, and Brigham Young, who commanded the 
Mormon hegira, must have been endowed with these qualities; and no doubt other 
examples of “second-generation” wisdom of this kind could be cited.  It was a 
characteristic that was less common among initiators, 

 'second-generation' wisdom, ..simple vision, the strength of character and the 
evangelical fire of the fanatical initiator were blended with the balanced 
judgment and practical managerial capacity of the successful consolidator.  
This was an unusual combination of characteristics; and in view of (his) 
background , his absolute rejection of orthodoxy was also unusual. 

 ..He was extreme, but logical and realistic; revolutionary, but not violent. 
When religious fire, moral courage, and good judgment ..have all been given due 
credit, something remains unexplained--some ingredient of the personality--. I 
think that this unnamed quality can without sentimentality be called “love of 
life.”  ..I believe Noyes, unlike many sectarians, was a great yea-sayer, an 
enhancer of life,” 

 

 

 








Reply via email to