--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to see any of these rationalizations hold up in court!
I guess you must have missed Lawson's post saying: "A perfectly valid attitude for someone enlightened, though you have to face the consquences regardless of your state of consciousness, if you are caught." > > Sal > > > On Feb 4, 2006, at 9:32 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > ONLY if you buy the definition of enlightenment that > > Maharishi peddles. That's my point. His definition > > is that the enlightened can do no wrong. Therefore, > > if you assume that someone is enlightened, that person > > can do no wrong. What I'm suggesting is that this is > > a VERY self-serving definition of enlightenment, one > > whose very purpose is to allow the person giving the > > definition to get away with anything they want, if he > > can convince people that he's enlightened.. > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
