--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <no_reply@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > You seem to be beyond MMY's teachings. Do you feel you have > > > > transcended his insights and have (re)cognized a newer or > higher > > > > reality? Do you feel your insights are deeper and superior to > his? > > > > > > > Question for you: Why should you, or anyone else, use MMY and > what > > > he says or writes as the 'gold standard' for their spiritual > > > development? I'm serious, not just being rhetorical... > > > <snip...> Again, his view and teachings may not be perfect, the best, > > or a gold standard. But without further info I would bet on it over > > the one-man,one-generation Santa Claran tradition. > > Oh c'mon, that's just BS...to insinuate that I am somehow comparing > myself to the Holy Tradition, or trying to start a tradition of my > own.
Perhaps you are not reading carfully again. Or perhaps your cognitive problems are flaring up again. Try reading the post again slowly and carefully. You have tangented off on some non-exsistant points in my post, and missed its substance. Pity. But a clear pattern. I said that with various key points of MMY's teaching, you strongly are at odds. MMY says his teaching comes from "his" Holy Tradition. Thus it follows that per HIS teaching / model, your views are at odds with (in MMY's view) the Holy Tradition's teachings. And some would hold MMY's teaching is not consistent with the "vedic tradition" (aka holy tradition). As I conceeded, you may have the correct slant on things. Maybe not. That does not change the point made: your views are at odds with (in MMY's view) the Holy Tradition. As far as your own traditon, I was following up and extending the humorous comment MMY made about Walter Bellin. Don't be so literal. I am not suggesting you are physically setting up a tradtition. But figuratively, your world view (aka figurateively and humerously analogous to a tradition) differs from MMY's Holy Tradition (in his view). > Your confusion comes about because you *don't* fully surrender to > the Holy Tradition. As usual, I am intrigued by your self-delusions of omnicience. You know nothing of me or my inner world. >Something that would do you an infinite amount > of good. Since you are such a devotee of the Holy tradition, perhaps you can tell us some things about its members. Whats your insight of Parashara? And Vyassa. What a yogi and seer! Whats your view on Kanchi? Was that really Shankara's favorite math? Whats your favorite Shankarian hymn? Did you learn puja to the Holy Tradition? I was under the impression you were not a teacher. When you say that I "*don't* fully surrender to the Holy Tradition", are you implying my pujas, and thus my 500 initiations were incorrect? Imperfect? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
