On Feb 28, 2006, at 1:40 PM, authfriend wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:




On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:48 PM, authfriend wrote:



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> 


wrote:





--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@>

wrote:



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <no_reply@> 


wrote:





That's it. That was also Papaji's point stating too many

are hanging around already too long.




Yes, many would rather wallow in the inertia of their 'seeker'

identity, proclaiming enlightenment can't be so, because of

this, and that, and the other thing...




Gotta agree. And it ain't just here...it's a fairly

universal trend in spiritual groups. Those who say

that they have experienced the goal that is shared

by pretty much the entire group (for example,

enlightenment) are regularly dissed by those in

the group who have not had such an experience.

One would think they'd be happy that someone is

actually getting what they paid for, but the

reality is sadly often the opposite.



In other words, when someone claims to be enlightened,

we should just accept it without question?



Or what if you were familiar with the state people were describing/ 

conveying/satsanging and knew it as "other than" the big E?



Not what Barry stipulated; read it again, please.

Then see if you can figure out what point I'm

making with my question.


I already understood your response, thank you.



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to