--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff > <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > I often appreciate your point of view which recognizes the value of > > the technique and the notion that some things are at least within > > the realm of the conceivable (if not the practical, or maybe even > > possible), but I have to ask here--whence arrise the need to test > > whose loyalty? > > > > Why does any governor who had been active *especially* during the > > past 15-20 years or longer need their loyalty tested? > > > > Why does any ordinary practitioner of TM need loyalty at all, let > > alone need to have it tested? > > I think it's worth noting that the concept of "loyalty > test" tends to be promoted here by those who never > became TM teachers. They've never risked *anything* > or put *anything* on the line for the TM movement. > But in their eyes those who have -- for decades -- are > legitimately considered "disloyal" because they can > no longer stomach the never-ending stream of insanity > coming from an insane organization. > > It's like saying, "These teachers who don't do what > they're told are disloyal, whereas we who never did > diddleysquat for the TM movement and never will are > still loyal." > > Yeah, right. >
Loyal to the TMO, not whatever mystical non-organization you haven't named. And there have been several schisms already over the years, including SSRS and Deepak Chopra. As Judy says, MMY apparently is triggering a final schism while he is still alive in order to minimize any breakups that happen when he dies. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
