The Global Warming Scam
by Nima Sanandaji and Fred Goldberg
by Nima Sanandaji and Fred Goldberg

         

The media portrays a dramatic image of how the ice is melting in the 
polar regions as a consequence of global warming. We are warned that 
the North Pole might become icefree during the summer months at the 
end of this century and that the polar bears might become extinct 
due to this development. 

But is this really a realistic image? Sure, there is research that 
indicates that the ice sheets are being reduced, but there are also 
studies that show the complete opposite. An example of this is a 
study in the scientific journal Geophysical Research Letter where 
the Swedish researcher Peter Winsor compares data collected by 
submarines below the Arctic ice. His conclusions are that the 
thickness of the ice has been almost constant between 1986 and 1997.

If you look at the South Pole there are studies that show an 
increase in the mass of the ice. In a study published in the journal 
Nature a number of polar researchers showed that they had observed a 
net cooling of 0.7 degrees in the region between 1986 and 2000. 
Another study published in Science showed that the East-Antarctic 
ice sheet had grown with 45 million metric tones between 1992 and 
2003.

Are the ices growing or melting? The simple answer is that there 
exist studies that point to both directions, perhaps indicating that 
scientists know relatively little about global climate. But what 
counts to most ordinary people is what media is reporting, and media 
is often highlighting the most alarming studies and seldom report of 
studies that go against the notion that human activity leads to 
global warming. To put it simply, the news is filtered through an 
environmentalist view of the world. 


An interesting example of how media sometimes gets it wrong is how 
journalists reported that there had never been so little ice in the 
Arctic than in 2005. This claim was based on satellite images by 
NASA which showed that the geographic extent of the ice sheet had 
never been so small since measurement began in 1979. One must 
however keep in fact that about half of the ice in the Arctic melts 
each summer and that two months before this measurment the extent of 
the ice sheet was the same as the previous year. The problem is that 
satellite images show the surface of the ice but not the thickness. 

Capten Årnell at the summer expedition with the polar-ship Oden 
could tell that he had never seen so much ice in the Arctic than in 
2005. It was with great difficulty that he had passed through the 
region. What had happened in 2005 seems to be that the ice had 
packed densely against the Canadian part of the Arctic. The 
geographical extent had been reduced but the ice was thicker.

As for polar bears, much points to that their numbers are increasing 
rather than diminishing. Mitch Taylor, a Canadian expert on animal 
populations, estimates that the number of polar bears in Canada has 
increased from 12 000 to 15 000 the past decade. Steven C Amstrup 
and his college have studied a population of polar bears in Alaska 
and reported that the number of females had increased from 600 to 
900 between 1976 and 1992. Even a report from the WWF which is 
entitled "Polar bears at risk" and warns that the populations of the 
polar bears might become extinct due to global warming, supports 
that the number of polar bears is increasing. In the report the 
polar bears in the world are divided into 20 populations. It shows 
out that only 2 of these populations are decreasing, while 10 are 
stable, 5 are growing and 3 are not possible to comment about.

Global climate is an important issue to debate, but it is sad that 
what is communicated often has a clear shifting towards the worst-
case scenarios and the doomsday theories. There is no reason to 
scare people by giving them only one side of the argument. 

March 18, 2006

Nima Sanandaji [send him mail] is president of the Swedish think 
tank Captus and the editor of Captus Journal. He is a graduate 
student in biochemistry at the University of Cambridge. Fred 
Goldberg is associate professor at the Royal School of Technology in 
Stockholm and was on a Polar trip whilst writing this article. 

Copyright © 2006 LewRockwell.com 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to