--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff > > > > <no_reply@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > "In the course of that review, we did not develop any > > > > evidence > > > > > > > > > suggesting that anyone who had advance knowledge of > > the > > > > Sept. > > > > > > > > > 11 attacks traded on the basis of that information," > > the > > > > SEC > > > > > > > > > said. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's nice, but I'd prefer to hear this from an > > > > > > > > organization not under the thumb of the administration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beyond just declaring it is so, you will have to make an > > > > actual > > > > > > > case that SEC is under the administrations thumb, or that > > the > > > > > > > admin influenced the report, before using it as a credible > > > > > > > argument. > > > > > > > > > > Since I wasn't using it as an argument, merely stating > > > > > my preference, I don't have to do anything. > > > > > > > > > > But out of the kindness of my heart, for anyone who > > > > > has been living in a cave for the past several years: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/release.cfm?ID=1816 > > > > > > > > > > That's just a taste; there's plenty more along the > > > > > same lines. > > > > > > > > I guess Janet Reno was under the then Clinton Administration > > thumb > > > > when she approved all of Kenneth Starr's requests for > > prosecutions > > > > under the MonicaGate scandal... > > > > > > Non sequitur. > > > > > > > > > Number of times Judy Stein has used the term "non sequitur" on > > google groups: 280. > > > > Evidence: http://tinyurl.com/nvpq3 > > Number of times it has been an actual non sequitur: 7 > > Number of times the explcit or implied logic sequence simply flew over > Judy's head: 273 > > Evidence: Just read these posts: > http://tinyurl.com/nvpq3
Number of times Judy has been right: Always. Number of times the person Judy has been debating has been right: None. > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
