--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steven klayman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > part of todays [EMAIL PROTECTED] > exchange. > steve > > > Thanks to all for the info. > > So, I guess Diksha is a form of shaktipat or > something? > > I believe Muktananda gave shaktipat. If an agreed on > definition as i understand it is the transference of > the guru's energy to the disciple, then deeksha is not > shaktipat. I have never heard it refered to by the > deeksha Oneness Movement as shaktipat. A more > appropriate definition might be the laying on of > hands. > Some see the golden light go into the crown chakra. > And virtually everybody feels it enter the body and > then do different things. For some it is physical work > on a part of the body, for some it is bliss and joy, > for some it results in kundalini moving, for others it > is deep peace and quiteness and a few dont notice > much of anything. Almost all notice work going on in > the head or on the head or both.But it is not anything > that the deeksha giver does. He is merely a wire > between the Divine Presence and the recipient. > While many have immediate mystical experiences it is > pointed out that those experiences are just temporary > (even if reoccurring) experiences. the ultimate effect > is to live an awakened life, a life free from > suffering. Mystical experiences dont necessarily > produce a joyful life. >
Is TM a mystical experience? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
