--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" 
> <reavismarek@> wrote:
> >
> > Judy, thanks for the correction; I did a quick search and didn't
> > think to check and see if this was a separate opinion.  I assumed 
> > (and apparently, incorrectly) that this was from the Court's actual 
> > ruling.
> 
> Well, I guess an opinion, concurring or dissenting, is
> technically part of the ruling; I'm not sure how the
> terminology works.  But I just wanted to point out that
> it's sort of an extended addendum that provides a
> detailed rationale for the ruling, and is by only one of
> the three judges.
> 
> The lower court ruling is much less interesting, much
> more doctrinaire and superficial.

Classic Jerry.
> 
> > Some judges do write with great clarity and those that do, not
> > infrequently, with great wit and charm.  The opinion I quoted is, I
> > feel, an accurate and cogent evaluation of the combined TM/SCI
> > position vis-a-vis religion.
> 
> I'm glad to know you think so.  My perspective on it
> is, to say the least, inexpert, so I'm pleased to have
> it confirmed.  It's the first, and so far the only,
> detailed opinion I've read on an appeals court case
> dealing with a constitutional issue, and I was really
> quite impressed by it.
> 
> I'd love to know more about Judge Adams.  Do you know
> his first name, by any chance?  I can't find it in the
> document.
> 
> Do appeals court rulings typically include opinions by
> one or more of the judges, or does one get written only
> if an individual judge is inspired to explore the issue
> in depth?
> 
> > One of the great stories from that case that I heard about was about
> > Jerry Jarvis  being cross-examined about the puja and its meaning 
> > from plaintiff's attorney.   The lawyer was attempting to get Jerry 
> > to admit that he (and all TM teachers) literally believed 
> > everything that was in the puja -- all the divine stuff -- and 
> > therefore, obviously, TM was a religion.  Jerry repeatedly denied 
> > the literalism of the puja and finally deadpanned that he did not 
> > *really* believe that Guru Dev had lotus feet.
> 
> <belly laugh>  Never heard that; that's great.
>






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to