<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate >
>
> Perhaps variations and imperfections of the [INTERPRETATION of the]
> "experience" of IT, consciousness being alive within itself explains
> some of the logical discrpency. IT certainly feels like IT is
> self-sufficient as if it has nothing to do with any aspect of the
> body, that nothing supports it.
Right-- consciousness alive within itself is self-sufficient.
But are other interpretations
> possible? Such as, IT could absolutely feel like that, but indeed
> also have some physiological correlates?
Yes, it expresses itself through the physiology also, self-
sufficently. The issue isn't where IT expresses itself, it is our
complete realization that the _expression_ is occurring, by itself, self-
sufficiently, through whatever vehicle has realized that IT is itself.
(which raises the issue are
> correlates simply similtaneous phenomenon, or causative?)
IT is the simultaneous phenomenon, and all the causitive correlates
are IT also. In the second case, IT causes itself.
Again, we are fooled into thinking we are the cause of IT, when in
fact, IT is the cause of IT. We just don't realize IT when we are
fooled into thinking we are the cause of IT.
>
> I left out an important word now in [brackets].
>
> I will delete the original post and repost with the correction.
>
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
| Maharishi university of management | Maharishi mahesh yogi | Ramana maharshi |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
