--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On May 21, 2006, at 4:12 AM, sparaig wrote:
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > Domash, IIRC, ... but
> > > > he didn't buy into MMY's ideas about Quantum Mechanics.
>
> That sounds quite funny, "MMY's ideas about Quantum Mechanics". MMY
> was was not talking in detail about QM, he left that to Domash -- and
> in that era also to a lesser degree Alex Hankey and ???
> whats-his-name. Larry and co. developed a lot of analogies and
> paralells to SCI/Consciousness from QM, releativity and  other aspects
> of modern physics. Larry certainly "bought" into the analogies and
> parallels -- he created them
>
> I observed that where there was as gentle rift was M's growing series
> of proclamations, 1974-76+, that the infinite potential of  the
> quantum field aka, later, the Vacuum State, was not just a good
> analogy and parlallel to Consciousness, it WAS Consciousness. He held
> that the QM equations were describing Consciousness itself. Thats the
> idea Larry originally had some difficulty publically supporting.
> Though he moved closer to it via investigating and providing
> supporting materials, I am not clear that he ever fully subscribed to
> it. And if he did, I would not think that he still does.
>
>
>
> > > Neither did Hagelin till he was told "make it work, or you're out
> of here".
>
> By tweaking string theroy to make it more vedic, as brought up in an
> adjacent post, does not indicate that John believed then that the
> Unified Field IS Consciousness.
>
> Though curently he appears to, at last publically, make that case or
> one close to it. Anyone closely parsed his language for wiggle room?
>

I think that Hagelin buys the idea whole-heartedly. I believe that any parsing that you
might do only reveals evidence that he has a scientist's self-conscious intent to distance
himself from his own non-supportable-by-evidence beliefs, not evidence that he doesn't
have those beliefs.

Hagelin has staked his personal reputation on these beliefs, but "personal reputation" isn't
"scientific evidence" and he knows it.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to