In a message dated 6/12/06 10:15:53 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Neither Lincoln nor FDR had battle experience. But a “President” who isn’t really the president because both elections were stolen for him and who went AWOL during the cushy military “service” his daddy arranged for him is on pretty shaky ground. __._,_.___
And it's ironic, too, how many of those who would send others to fightSal, are you saying only a President that has battle experience has the moral authority to order troops into battle?We could go a step further, maybe only a congress who's individual members each have battle experience should be able to vote on resolutions authorizing the president to send troops into harms way.< It just can't work that way. We elect people with or with out that experience and give them that authority. All screening begins in the primaries.
in wars have never actually volunteered for one themselves--or even
come close. Apparently it's only other people, or other people's kids,
who should put their asses on the line.
Sal
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
| Religion and spirituality | Maharishi mahesh yogi |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
