--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
[EMAIL PROTECTED].. wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/23/06
11:35:36 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I think from comments I have read in this forum before,
>
> there are a lot of people that want more government
> > controls
over the economy and means of production. Just
> > how much control
is a big question.
>
> Yes, that's a big question, typically
unexamined by
> those who like to label liberals "socialists,those
> the only two choices were unbridled capitalism and
> Marxian
socialism.
>
> But it's a lot easier to decide which side you're
on
> if you can make yourself believe there are only two
> with
nothing in between. Otherwise you might actually
> have to *think* about
what's involved.
>
> (General "you," not you personally.)
>
> Yes I think the question is where do you draw the line from
>
referring to a country as being capitalistic and being socialistic.
>
There is a point where it tilts from one side to the other. The
> more
one pushes that balance beam towards more social programs
> paid for by
the wealthy, the closer it is to tipping to being
> called a socialist
country.
Right, and you end up with a lot of wealthy socialists.
;-)
