TurquoiseB wrote:

>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>
>>authfriend wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote:
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Wrong.  Thread hijacking is considered bad netiquette and you'll 
>>>>get bashed for it on other lists.   I've been a programmer for 
>>>>over 
>>>>20 years and have been using email and online clients for that 
>>>>long.  I think I might know a little about how these things work.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>   
>>>I'm not a programmer, but I've been participating
>>>in electronic forums, via BBSs, email, newsgroups,
>>>and on the Web for over 20 years, and I've never
>>>heard the term "thread hijacking" except from
>>>you.  I have no idea what it's supposed to mean.
>>>      
>>>
>>Here's more on the subject:
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_Hijacking
>>    
>>
>
>I don't really give a shit about threading, period,
>since I've discovered that it's more fun for me to
>read forums such as this one in strict chronological 
>order than it is to read them 'threaded.'
>
>But, that said, doesn't the following definition 
>from Wikipedia...
>
>@   Thread hijacking is the act of taking a forum 
>@   discussion thread off topic by discussing a 
>@   subject entirely unrelated to the subject at hand.
>@   
>@   While this can be an intentional act of trolling, 
>@   it is often accidental - caused by other participants 
>@   in the discussion responding to a throwaway remark, 
>@   taking the thread off at a tangent to the original 
>@   subject matter. The results, whilst often humourous, 
>@   often extract a feeling of resentment from the author 
>@   of the post.
>
>...sound a lot like EGO to you?  :-)
>
>I mean, somebody introduces a concept and then gets
>uptight when someone takes the concept off in directions
>he or she didn't intend? I'm picturing Aretha Franklin
>singing, A  T  T  A  C  H  M  E  N  T.
>
>:-)
>
>What you're complaining about with Thunderbird, by the
>way, is a limitation of ITS software. It was designed
>with certain protocols in mind, as if they were standards.
>They weren't.
>
No it isn't a limitation of Thunderbird which is very flexible.  Have 
you ever even used it?  This is so funny, a bunch who embraces coherence 
embracing incoherence. :)





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to