--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you look at an actual chart,
I am not sure why you feel the need for snideness. The link I refer to has a number charts I created. Perhaps you should look at the link. And this particular post to which you are responding refers to about 10 potential TMO impacts from 1967 to present. So your, your reponse to this post is um, "incoherent". :) Thus I assume you are actually commenting about prior posts, on another thread, refering to this last week being the largest gain in two years, 3%. Sure this last weeks gains are in the upper part of a trading range since June. My charts, if you would look, were constructed to identify long-run trendlines going back to 2003 and to see if the current course has an impact outside the index's long-run trend. If it breaks out of its two month trading range this next week it will be as interesting as this week 2-year largest gain. And beyond that, as I say on the blog that has the charts, "With a 5% additional rise in the next several weeks would, the index would cross its long run (statistical) regression-based trendline, that is, its movement would be indicative of a normal correction towards equillibrium. With a 20% additional rise of the index over the next 10 weeks or so, the index would exceed its upper 1 standard deviation bound -- the general boundary for deviations of the index from its long-run trend line. This would be indicative of a possible SIGNIFICANT effect from the course, and not simply the index following its long run trend, with normal deviations. If the 20% + rise increase over the next 6-10 weeks did occur, breaking its normal deviation from its long run trend, and assuming the course continues that long, and if after the end of course the index declined back below its long-run statistical trendline, it would be noteworthy." >you'll see that the SP > index is merely at the upper end of a trading range. > If the buying does not continue, it may return back > down to 1224. > --- "new.morning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://2006-course-effects.blogspot.com/ > > > > Holy Shit!!! Maybe this thing is real. :) > > > > I looked at the major Intro Courses, Rounding and > > Yogic Flying courses > > in relation to S&P500. At first glance, there > > appears to be a > > phenomenal correlation. See graph on link. Verticl > > lines indicate > > start of new major TMO initiative. Text descriptor > > for each verticl > > line begins to the immeidiate right of each vertical > > bar. > > > > However, the market has been in a long-run upward > > trend since the > > beginning of the graph (1960) and coincidence cannot > > be ruled out. > > Correlation is not causation. > > > > The case for causation become strong if the market > > reverses when major > > courses are reduced or stopped. One example of this > > is the period > > 1973-1975, after Mallorca I&II , Fuigii and initial > > La Antilla -- when > > the emphasis was on starting MIU -- and less on > > intro and TTC/rounding > > courses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To subscribe, send a message to: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Or go to: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > > and click 'Join This Group!' > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
