--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 8/12/06 7:21:12 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> > > Ban anything that can be used to determine the sex of the
> > > > fetus. Ultrasound while the mom isn't allowed to look, would
be
> > > > OK, as long as the doctor doesn't reveal the sex.
> > >
> > > Hey, that might actually work.
> >
> > So let me see if understand this.
> >
> > Judy is all for the right of a mother-to-be to kill her fetus
>
> ("Woman" would be the appropriate term in this
> case.)
>
> but
> > she's for banning her right to know what that soon-to-be-dead
> > fetus' sex is????
>
> What I'm against is abortion based on the
> sex of the fetus.
>
> But Judy, the mother doesn't have to give a reason why she wants
> to abort a fetus. She doesn't even have to tell the ultra sound
> tech or doctor she has any plans to abort and she has every right
> to know the sex of the fetus as she would the general health of the
> fetus at the time of ultra sound.
Which country are we talking about here, the U.S. or
China?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
