In a message dated 8/21/06 7:56:25 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otherwise, why not say "Almost Nobody"? Exactly. You bated Bhairitu. He had to come to his own defense and deny
your implication. And if you didn't want to attribute views to him that he
doesn't hold, you wouldn't have mentioned him by name in the first place. Also
if your intention was never to imply Bhairitu held a certain view, I think I
would feel somewhat "used" if I were Bhairitu for being nudged to have to
clarify my own views or have others possibly think otherwise because of
what somebody else said. That, is baring false witness, a lie.< But Judy
don't get me wrong, I thought what you said was in jest and never took it
seriously. Only your adamant denial caused me to dwell on it and look at your
comment a little more critically.
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
__,_._,___ |
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Something fishy about alleged Jonbenet ... MDixon6569
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Something fishy about alleged Jonbenet ... MDixon6569
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Something fishy about alleged Jonbenet ... MDixon6569
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Something fishy about alleged Jonbenet ... MDixon6569
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Something fishy about alleged Jonbenet ... MDixon6569
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Something fishy about alleged Jonbenet ... MDixon6569
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Something fishy about alleged Jonbenet ... MDixon6569
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Something fishy about alleged Jonbenet ... MDixon6569