--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" 
> > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That's what some pundits are predicting because many people 
will
> > > > have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close 
to
> > > > 300 bucks and many are just tired of the Spyware issues and 
so
> > > > on which will surely follow Vista. It's said to be a fairly
> > > > different UI that many hardcore Wintel people may not 
tolerate.
> > > 
> > > I held out as long as I could before switching from Win2000 to 
XP, 
> > and
> > > I'll probably hold out as long as I can before switching to 
Vista.
> > > After all, it's only when Microsoft starts shipping a product 
that 
> > the
> > > real beta testing begins, and it usually takes a couple years 
to 
> > weed
> > > out the most egregious flaws. Besides, this PC is only 3 years 
old,
> > > and its 2.8GHz P4 is overkill for what I do. A couple years 
from 
> > now,
> > > everything will be multiple cores up the wazoo and fully 
capable of
> > > running the most bloated of bloatware.
> > >
> > Exactly. v1.0 is never a good deal. Hey remember 640K max RAM 
for 
> > DOS with a 4.77MHz processor speed?
> 
> Actually, I don't. My first PC, purchased in Dec 1992, was a $2400 
AST
> Power Exec laptop with a 25 MHz 386SL and 4 Megs of RAM, which I
> upgraded to 8 Megs with a $140 4 Meg module. Windows 3.11

I remember that generation well, since my friend and I were 
convinced that a 25 MHz processor was as fast as PCs would ever go! 
 
> I remember having to wait for .jpg images to slowly appear from 
top to
> bottom, as the poor little CPU struggled to decompress the image. 
Back
> then, every new computer was a giant leap in performance. But, with
> what I use a PC for, I stopped noticing any difference once CPUs 
hit
> 1GHz. Right now, I'm running two different versions of Opera, 
Firefox,
> Thunderbird, PocoMail, and Winamp playing 160kbps streaming audio, 
and
> the Windows Task Manager shows CPU load at 2%.
>





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to