Once in Brasil while speaking to queen marcia in regard to king tk I said Ele esta chegando aqui soh em busca de buceta................................OH BOY! What i said was that the guy was simply coming here behind sex as in slang he is just out for pussy.....
WOW! did she go nuts. I think we have spoken 4 times at most since then. In Brasil they dont talk about sex or use sexual expressions they way we do. Maybe here it is the same?????
----- Original Message ----
From: curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 2:12:42 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A theory of Karma, TMOers, and the TMO's "Persona"
From: curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 2:12:42 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A theory of Karma, TMOers, and the TMO's "Persona"
Judy: "You were wrong in your first impression of what I
wrote--that I was accusing you of putting down
women--and I haven't seen you admit that."
Judy from an earlier post: "No, no, "booty," as in plunder, prize, the
spoils of conquest; "knock" as in knock down, conquer,
take for oneself."
Me: Yeah, I don't know how I would have interpreted this as a putdown
on me for having a bad attitude about women. It might have been the
words you used and their meaning.
As far as my own malicious digs back at you, you are right. We have a
shitty communication dynamic and I take responsibility for my part of it.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> >
> > Judy:
> > > It's one thing when you're young and foolish and
> > > don't know any better--I had more than my share
> > > of casual sex when I was that age, believe me--but
> > > quite another when you're still bragging about it
> > > decades later as if you never got beyond it.
> >
> >
> > Me:
> > There was no triumphalist tone Judy.
>
> Oh, nonsense, of course there was.
>
> You made it all up. All my
> > "boot knocking" at MIU was in the context of relationships, I was
> > never into casual sex since relationship sex is much better for me.
> > You made up a put down, and having been called on it, you are
> > attempting to continue your farce. You were wrong about the
> > words and what I meant, and even after that is proven to you, you
> > hold on to your malicious agenda. It was a throwaway line for
> > people with a sense of humor, only you would try to twist it into
> > a putdown of me.
>
> You mean, the way you tried to twist what I wrote
> to start with into a slam at you for putting down
> women? Not to mention your insinuation that I
> don't enjoy sex much. You aren't exactly in a
> position to be self-righteous about "malicious
> agendas."
>
> I'm not sure how you have "proved" anything to me.
> You've made a claim about what you actually meant.
>
> > Our class at MIU was mostly just out of high school, normal college
> > kids. We were not exposed to the celibacy weirdness that came
> later.
> > So we had normal relationships and had sex like normal college
> kids.
> > The later classes of MIU got the "sex is bad" message so they were
> > conflicted about having sex, even in the context of committed
> > relationships. So my class had the most sex because we had not yet
> > bee messed up my movement superstitions about sex as losing magic
> > energy. So your point was a made-up put down, and you can't admit
> > you were wrong like a decent person
>
> You were wrong in your first impression of what I
> wrote--that I was accusing you of putting down
> women--and I haven't seen you admit that.
>
> And I haven't had a *chance* to admit I was wrong
> about what *I* actually meant until this post. I'm
> happy to take your claim in the post I'm responding
> to at face value and acknowledge that I misunderstood
> what you were getting at.
>
> I guess I was misled by some of your previous
> remarks, and those of a couple of the other men
> here, which have seemed to me to put a premium on
> sex for its own sake. That isn't what you were doing
> in this post. I should have commented on those
> earlier ones rather than waiting until this post.
>
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
wrote--that I was accusing you of putting down
women--and I haven't seen you admit that."
Judy from an earlier post: "No, no, "booty," as in plunder, prize, the
spoils of conquest; "knock" as in knock down, conquer,
take for oneself."
Me: Yeah, I don't know how I would have interpreted this as a putdown
on me for having a bad attitude about women. It might have been the
words you used and their meaning.
As far as my own malicious digs back at you, you are right. We have a
shitty communication dynamic and I take responsibility for my part of it.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> >
> > Judy:
> > > It's one thing when you're young and foolish and
> > > don't know any better--I had more than my share
> > > of casual sex when I was that age, believe me--but
> > > quite another when you're still bragging about it
> > > decades later as if you never got beyond it.
> >
> >
> > Me:
> > There was no triumphalist tone Judy.
>
> Oh, nonsense, of course there was.
>
> You made it all up. All my
> > "boot knocking" at MIU was in the context of relationships, I was
> > never into casual sex since relationship sex is much better for me.
> > You made up a put down, and having been called on it, you are
> > attempting to continue your farce. You were wrong about the
> > words and what I meant, and even after that is proven to you, you
> > hold on to your malicious agenda. It was a throwaway line for
> > people with a sense of humor, only you would try to twist it into
> > a putdown of me.
>
> You mean, the way you tried to twist what I wrote
> to start with into a slam at you for putting down
> women? Not to mention your insinuation that I
> don't enjoy sex much. You aren't exactly in a
> position to be self-righteous about "malicious
> agendas."
>
> I'm not sure how you have "proved" anything to me.
> You've made a claim about what you actually meant.
>
> > Our class at MIU was mostly just out of high school, normal college
> > kids. We were not exposed to the celibacy weirdness that came
> later.
> > So we had normal relationships and had sex like normal college
> kids.
> > The later classes of MIU got the "sex is bad" message so they were
> > conflicted about having sex, even in the context of committed
> > relationships. So my class had the most sex because we had not yet
> > bee messed up my movement superstitions about sex as losing magic
> > energy. So your point was a made-up put down, and you can't admit
> > you were wrong like a decent person
>
> You were wrong in your first impression of what I
> wrote--that I was accusing you of putting down
> women--and I haven't seen you admit that.
>
> And I haven't had a *chance* to admit I was wrong
> about what *I* actually meant until this post. I'm
> happy to take your claim in the post I'm responding
> to at face value and acknowledge that I misunderstood
> what you were getting at.
>
> I guess I was misled by some of your previous
> remarks, and those of a couple of the other men
> here, which have seemed to me to put a premium on
> sex for its own sake. That isn't what you were doing
> in this post. I should have commented on those
> earlier ones rather than waiting until this post.
>
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
