--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "I made a post this morning, a generic post about
> "feeling the body" "
> 
> I protest your deleting any post where someone's body gets 
> felt. You of anyone should understand the group's right to 
> a cheap thrill once in a while.

I wasn't thinking. My apologies to all of those
whose daily cheap thrill comes from FFL.  :-)


> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In 
> > > > FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis" 
> > > > <tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > TorquiseB writes sinpped:
> > > > > Have you ever dealt with a long-term cocaine addict?
> > > > > Same behavior. The first reaction to a suggestion 
> > > > > from a friend as to how to seek help is 1) denial 
> > > > > that he *needs* help, 2) anger at the person who 
> > > > > suggested it, 3) a compulsion to badrap the person
> > > > > who has made the suggestion to others, to cast
> > > > > them as the person who needs help, and 4) a rush
> > > > > behind closed doors back to the cocaine baggie.
> > > > 
> > > > Interestingly, this post from Barry has not
> > > > appeared on the FFL Web site.  I'm not sure
> > > > whether it's just gotten delayed or lost, or
> > > > whether Barry thought better of it for some
> > > > reason and deleted it from the site.
> > > 
> > > Barry did quite a bit of deleting this morning:
> > > 
> > > Nov 16, 2006 4:48 am
> > > turquoiseb <Email Private>
> > > Deleted message #123002
> > > 
> > > Nov 16, 2006 4:48 am
> > > turquoiseb <Email Private>
> > > Deleted message #123001
> > > 
> > > Nov 16, 2006 4:50 am
> > > turquoiseb <Email Private>
> > > Deleted message #122937
> > > 
> > > Nov 16, 2006 4:50 am
> > > turquoiseb <Email Private>
> > > Deleted message #122843
> > > 
> > > Nov 16, 2006 4:52 am
> > > turquoiseb <Email Private>
> > > Deleted message #122713
> > > 
> > > Nov 16, 2006 4:53 am
> > > turquoiseb <Email Private>
> > > Deleted message #122538
> > > 
> > > Nov 16, 2006 5:45 am
> > > turquoiseb <Email Private>
> > > Deleted message #123293
> > >  
> > > > Would somebody who received it via email be
> > > > willing either to quote it in full on the Web
> > > > site, or email it to me?
> > 
> > I simply cannot tell you how much this amuses me.
> > 
> > I made a post this morning, a generic post about
> > "feeling the body" and the resistance to it I (and
> > presumably Robert) had noticed in our spiritual
> > travels, and then posted it. Then, a little later,
> > I read it and realized that it was unnecessary. I 
> > had said it all before, to no effect. So I deleted 
> > the sucker. While I was at it, I went back and looked 
> > at all the posts no one had ever replied to, to figure 
> > out what no one here was interested in, and then deleted 
> > them as well.
> > 
> > Some here will attribute nefarious intent to such
> > actions. I leave them to do so. Me, I stand on what 
> > I wrote originally, especially the last line:
> > 
> > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel" <babajii_99@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Eckart Tolle talks about this, as the 'pain body'.
> > > > Everyone has one, some more than others.
> > > > When the pain body is activated, these negative thoughts and
> > > > emotions arise.
> > > > He says to witness them, which is easier said then done...
> > > 
> > > Actually, it's much easier done than said, but when
> > > people have gotten used to being in pain and have
> > > made a lifestyle choice to settle for it, they resist
> > > the easy path in favor of the painful one, because it
> > > is more familiar to them.
> > > 
> > > > ...but, nonetheless, heals them in the long run.
> > > 
> > > The fascinating thing is, it would heal them in the
> > > *short* run as well, but the resistance is fierce.
> > > 
> > > That is what fascinates me about addiction, and about
> > > addictive behavior in a spiritual context -- the fact
> > > that people who have fallen into an addiction rut not
> > > only avoid any suggestion as to how to get out of the
> > > rut, but treat the suggestion as if it were a personal
> > > attack.
> > > 
> > > Have you ever dealt with a long-term cocaine addict?
> > > Same behavior. The first reaction to a suggestion
> > > from a friend as to how to seek help is 1) denial
> > > that he *needs* help, 2) anger at the person who
> > > suggested it, 3) a compulsion to badrap the person
> > > who has made the suggestion to others, to cast
> > > them as the person who needs help, and 4) a rush
> > > behind closed doors back to the cocaine baggie.
> > > 
> > > > It's the same kind of instruction that Maharishi gives in the
> > > > checking: Concerning 'overpowering thoughts, when it is
> > > > difficult to think the mantra- to just allow the attention
> > > > to be drawn to the area of the body which holds the
> > > > disconfort, and by allowing the attention to be drawn to
> > > > the body, will help facilitate the release.
> > > > So, with repeated attention or witness of the discomfort of
> > > > negative thoughts or emotions, instead of feeding into them,
> > > > just witness, seems to disolve, the pain with pracice.
> > > > It is the power of the transcendant to heal, the power of
> > > > witnessing.
> > > 
> > > I may no longer be a TMer, but I thoroughly agree
> > > with this advice. I have seen its counterpart in
> > > many other spiritual traditions.
> > > 
> > > *And* I have seen the anger and the resistance with
> > > which this advice is met by those who need to hear
> > > it the most. It's just utterly fascinating.
> > > 
> > > Because I'm mainly a Buddhist, and because Buddhists
> > > believe strongly in the importance of choice, I tend
> > > to treat the protestations that people make when
> > > reminded of how to avoid these negative emotions
> > > as having made a lifestsyle choice.
> > > 
> > > They have *decided* to "feed" the negative emotions
> > > (anger all the time) or the destructive behavior (not
> > > meditating). What makes the choice so obvious *as* a
> > > choice is the utter *simplicity* of the alternative
> > > they are rejecting so angrily (just shift your focus
> > > to something other than anger, or just prioritize
> > > meditation more highly than the other activities you
> > > have become addicted to). If the alternative being
> > > presented to them was *hard*, or painful, you might
> > > understand their resistance. But it isn't.
> > > 
> > > Bottom line is that in the world of spirituality
> > > some people choose to make progress, and others
> > > choose to make excuses.
> >
>



Reply via email to