--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > I have a pretty good idea what MMY means by it, > > although not experientially, because, as I've > > said, that sort of thing has simply never worked > > for me. <snip> > > But you are incorrect in stating that it doesn't work for you; it > works demonstrably fine. The motor is on and running; reverse or > forward are just the just the directions. That's the driver's > decision.
As far as I can tell, this formulation just moves it back a level without adding/subtracting/changing/clarifying anything. What I'm saying is that I've tried keeping my attention on the positive and away from the negative, and as a result have not seen the positive grow in my life, nor the negative decrease. For me, experientially, these kinds of formulations are empty of significance. If there's an on/off switch or a gearshift, I haven't been able to locate it. Which is why, incidentally, I started TM in the first place. Transcending on/off and backward/forward *does* work for me.
