--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> 
wrote:
> > > <snip> Hey, it's just the Paradox of Brahman.  
> > > 
> > > Not at all- its the failure of you and sparaig to just deal 
with 
> Peter 
> > > as Peter, and instead thinking that he should act differently 
than 
> he 
> > > is because he was talking about enlightened states earler.
> > 
> > Every aspect of Peter's response oozed attachment.
> 
> Attachment was oozing, but there was no Peter.
>
I don't get it- please explain. Thanks.

Reply via email to