--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > If you think Vaj is a "TB", I guess you never really talked to > him > > > or heard his talk on > > > > Spiritual Anarchy and how genuine spirituality is anarchistic > by > > > nature... > > > > > > > Kind of funny to say someone that calls himself Vajranatha is a > > > spiritual anarchist, don't you think? That name sounds very much > > > aligned with organized religion, probably Tibetan Buddhism. Oh > well, > > > one person's spiritual anarchist is another's religous shill, eh? > > > > > > > Don't know much about the Naths do ya Jim? > > > Please explain. >
Thanks, that did answer my question. BTW, do you have some strange foot fetish or do you just enjoy sticking your foot in your mouth? To answer your question there is probably no other group of yogins that would be considered less of an "organized religion" than the Nathas. They do epitomize freedom and sahaja.
