--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nablusos108" > <nablusos108@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" <llundrub@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. > > > > He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday. > > > > > > -----Frankly, his lack of understanding, wish to trample my > religion > > > (whether he was right or not), and wish to beat Vaj at some game > have > > > lowered my estimation of him. I didn't know he was such a > putz.This > > is why > > > people that take pictures with gurus and post them on the > internet as > > if > > > they mean something are not to be trusted. I had thought Jim was > a > > wiser, > > > smarter person. I guess one expects more maturity from others as > they > > all > > > get older. > > > > This Vaj/llundrup team, what payroll are they on ? > > > I don't personally include llundrub on the "vaj" TB team.
Do some Ritam on it. When "Vaj" makes a fool of himself llundrub is never very far away to cloud the matter claiming "Vaj" meant it differently. I's a pattern and it has been going on for a long time. Perhaps they are just religious, fundamentalist friends. When "Vaj" takes a holiday, or is preoccupied with other matters, llundrup will fill his shoes with, admittingly, a more sofisticated language but with the same ideas. When llundrup is less active, "Vaj" will be more active. Like the americans say; Go figure.
