On Jan 4, 2007, at 3:52 PM, sparaig wrote:

It's merely an analogy. Early MIU textbooks on physics (which were
self-published) detailed these analogies but then in a responsible
fashion gave a concluding chapter which stated these were just
analogies and 'you can only take analogies so far.' However I
wouldn't be surprised if the map had become the territory given the
cultish setting of the TMO.


Yeah, but the concept of constructive interference is the quintessence of the analogy. There's no analogy whatsoever if this part isn't correct in some respect. There's no "taking it too far" since if that part isn't right, there's nothing to take anywhere...


Well wouldn't that assume that the ME is propagated by *waves*? Basic physics measures these realities by doing fourier analysis of wave motion and their interactions. Is this being done to posit outcomes?

I'm just reading some work from the late, great neurophysiologist Francisco J. Varela titled Ethical Know-How: Action, Wisdom, and Cognition. It posits a different theory from neurobiology and cognitive science which uses emptiness as it's basis and considers Unity as a kind of a "virtual Self". It does not require or see a need for a transcendental "Self" as it's basis nor any wave for propagation (nor a need for "groups"). It's quite a good read if your open minded.

Reply via email to