--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "vajradhatu108"
> > <vajranatha@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@>
wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > >However, it seems to me that a saint carries his/her own
vastu,
> > and lives in
> > > > a realm far beyond those considerations.
> > >
> > > Never were truer words spoken!, but I have to add that it's
the
> > same for EVERYONE, you, me
> > > and all.
> > >
> > > Amen.
> > >
> > Agreed- it is the seekers in the Movement who blew this SV thing
all
> > out of proportion, and Maharishi lets everyone interpret it as
they
> > want to. And whether we are saints or not, there is some benefit
to
> > physical orientation- it shows up in every tradition. But it
isn't
> > the 'do it or else' benefit it is made out to be.
> >
>
> MMY wants all movement buildings to be SV. Beyond that, he's given
the TMO a never-
> ending task to remake the world in an SV image. Doesn't sound
like "do or else" scenario.
>
It sometimes gets represented that way though by the Movement.
