--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
> snip 
> > The seven states of consciousness are identified, according to 
the
> MUM style guide, as:
> > 
> > http://resources.mum.edu/manuals/styleguide.pdf  
> > Turiya Chetanå (Transcendental Consciousness) 
> > Turiyåtit Chetanå (Cosmic Consciousness) 
> > Bhagavad Chetanå (God Consciousness) 
> > Bråhmi Chetanå (Unity Consciousness) 
>   
> > Seems to me that these terms should be traceable to one or more
> sanskrit sources. 
> > Turiya, for instance, is found in one of the Upanishads.
> 
> 
> Brahmi Chetana or Brahman Consciousness, Maharishi himself refers 
to
> as *Cosmic Consciousness* in Love and God! Let me attempt to remove
> the confusion, when MMY talks about CC, if it's on the level of the
> individual he means simply Self-Realization or soul/jiva 
realization.
>  
> When he speaks of Bråhmi Chetanå (Unity) then he is *still* 
speaking
> of CC, but at the level of Brahman, get it?
> 
> Remember Jiva and Brahman are different terms signifying different
> degrees and quality of the one Cosmic Being.......
> 
> MMY repeatedly refers to Brahman as the state of Cosmic 
Consciousness
> which is consistent terminology with other groups. (See Gita CH V,
> vs21 & ChII vs 72).
> 
> It's confusing because the common nomenclature of Cosmic 
Consciousness
> as the final and highest state of consciousness, is correct. But 
MMY
> uses CC and UC interchangably and hence the confusion.
> 
> CC essentially is what MMY says it is in Love and God, Purnam adah 
and
> Purnam idam. (That Unmanifested Brahman is perfect and This 
Manifested
> Brahman is also perfect.) This is COSMIC CONSCIOUSNESS, the 
highest!
> 
> Just remember, TC or CC, according to MMY is simply Brahman on the
> level of the individual (jiva or soul) and therefore distinct in
> quality and degree from Brahman chaitanya. See Gita VI vs3.
>
Thanks for analyzing this so that it is clear. I too was confused by 
this apparent inconsistency, and though it felt right intuitively to 
conclude as you have, it is always satisfying to read the 
justification for intuition.

Reply via email to