--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "douglasportee" > > <douglasportee@> wrote: > > > > > http://brahmastan.us > > > > I emailed that URL to my brother, the Raja of Denver, and he > > replied, "Yes, the Brahmasthan that we are using is for the > > contiguous lower 48 states, not including Alaska and Hawaii." > > > > So, they are aware of this and are choosing, for whatever > > reason, to use the 48 state center. > > Maybe because itis the easiest and cheapest tobuy/build on?
Or maybe some theory of geographical contiguity being more important for a brahmastan than political integrity (not sure that's the right term)?
