" If history teaches us anything, it's that today's habit may be 
tomorrow's abomination. What people saw as a matter of course in the 
streets of 17th-century London -- rich men beating their servants, 
crowds gathered in a festival mood to watch bloody executions -- 
would horrify the pedestrian of 2007. Morality, too, has a history, 
but the people of any given period usually don't see it that way. 
They think that they already have a pretty solid understanding of 
right and wrong (even if they find it difficult to be virtuous) and 
rarely imagine that future generations might view them as 
unenlightened at best and depraved at worst. 

Activists, on the other hand, know different. They count on the 
evolution of morality. Recently, Adam Hochschild's fascinating "Bury 
the Chains" chronicled the means by which a group of committed 18th-
century idealists convinced their fellow citizens in Britain and 
America that slavery was an intolerable wrong. It wasn't easy, and it 
didn't happen overnight. Some people of that era thought that slavery 
was lamentable but intractable; others found it easy to justify an 
institution that brought them profits and comfort. Still others -- 
the majority, perhaps -- didn't give it much thought at all, as they 
sweetened their tea with sugar produced at brutal slave plantations 
on islands far, far away. 

 For this reason, even an omnivore should find an intellectual 
history of vegetarianism interesting. We, like the people of the 
early 1800s, could be living through a period of slow but profound 
ideological change. To the people of their own time, men like 
Granville Sharp and Thomas Clarkson -- early abolitionists and the 
founders of the first human rights movement -- seemed as impractical, 
as demanding, as self-righteous and as obsessed as many animal rights 
activists seem to us today. In the future, right-thinking people 
might look back at us meat eaters with the same disapproval we heap 
on those who considered slavery acceptable 200 years ago. 


http://www.salon.com/books/review/2007/01/25/stuart/index.html

Reply via email to